Reply
Valued Contributor
Posts: 966
Registered: ‎03-24-2010

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Sorry, I just don't "get" her clothes. Everything has an uneven hem!

Saving one dog won’t change the world, but it will surely change the world for that one dog
Richard C. Call
Highlighted
Super Contributor
Posts: 3,125
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

On 2/11/2015 grumpycat said:

I think the price is okay compared to what I've seen at retail outlets. The issue I have with LOGO is that everything is so boring and frumpy looking.

It can be boring if you don't style it ... personalize it.

IMHO -frumpy happens when someone doesn't have any personal style.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,997
Registered: ‎03-25-2012

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

It's their new S&H policy ($3.00). They are simply raising the price of the product to make up for it. And doing away with a couple of former policies to the customer's detriment.

Formerly Ford1224
We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Elie Wiesel 1986
Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,938
Registered: ‎12-29-2010

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

On 2/11/2015 Ford1224 said:

It's their new S&H policy ($3.00). They are simply raising the price of the product to make up for it. And doing away with a couple of former policies to the customer's detriment.

Ita! Exactly
"friends don't let friends drink white zinfandel"
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,380
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

On 2/9/2015 QVCPhobe said:

I was looking at the LOGO tanks and they seem to have increased over last year. One tank last year was about $29.00 and now it is about $34.00. Many of her pieces seem more expensive. What do you think?

I think those tops are in Kohls, Walmarts, Carson with much better fabrics and cheaper.

Q has raised it's prices on everything, it's all about profit with Q now not quality.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,169
Registered: ‎01-22-2012

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

On 2/11/2015 fthunt said:

Christine said it....................Perfectly! LOL

(looks like rags)

Looks like they would be good ones for my bag-o-rags, soft and easy dust pick up. Noticed Kate&Mallory had them on sale today for $l9.99. Had the chiffon running down the back. The chiffon wouldn't be good for dusting. Smiley Happy

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,169
Registered: ‎01-22-2012

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

The Q has raised prices & significantly. Pants that sold forever for $29., and with S&H plus tax was $39. Now, the price is $39. on all their pants. Susan Graver has increased substantially. With Susan, it's supply & demand; maybe so with D&Co. Denim & Co. is no real value anymore, just competitive with everyone else. Same with Susan. You pay for convenience here. Sometimes I will, and sometimes I won't. I used to think quality, value and convenience were all with the Q.

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 81
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Yes, LOGO prices have gone up - Monday night there was a tank, a Hot Pick on buy more and save $5 - well the tank in the video was a regular QVC price of $32 - it was now a regular QVC price of $37 - so they weren't giving you anything with the buy more and save - they were making $5. Also, with the new shipping policy - that is not good for the customer. I received 4 lunchtime special LOGO tops - not so great - I would have normally returned them but I would lose the original shipping of $12 and another $7 to send back - so that's $19 I'd lose. Crazy. Will definitely be cutting down on my shopping here!

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,550
Registered: ‎06-12-2013

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Being that LOGO is getting it's own show, I think the money is coming in for this line. Whomever, feels differently, I believe QVC doesn't care, since you are the minority.