Fashion

[DiAnne]

I don't care one way or the other about pants but I don't like jackets without pockets.  A couple of years ago I purchased two really cute jean-type jackets with no pockets.  They went to Goodwill because i never wore them.  

[shoesnbags]

The only pants I want pockets on are my jeans.  As several have already mentioned, it makes for a cleaner line/smoother fit.  

[ALRATIBA]

I don’t want pockets in my pants. I sew them closed and remove the lining.

Only place I want pockets is on myoiterwear

[Katcat1]

I really like the side pockets on pants that hardly show at all.  I also like a slip pocket (exterior) on a handbag.  Back pockets are useless and add bulk on pants.  Yes, pockets are important.

[Andreatoo]

It can be especially in jeans. But conversely I really don't like the patch pockets on the front of a shirt! I just don't like the look. A single breast pocket or even 2 is okay but that patch pocket slapped on the front down around your waist, no thank you!

[godi]

Depends on the garment, coat or jacket must have pockets. Pants or shorts depends on if dressy or casual. Shirts not so much adds bulk where I do not need it. I know when winter is over I miss all my pockets. 🤣🤣

If you can, please share the name of the dress you purchased I would like to see if it would suit me. 

[cherry]

No

[Snicks1]

With a few exceptions, yes it is a dealbreaker.
I also don't carry a bag most times. The only time I carry a bag is if I will be gone the entire day, or of course, on dressier occasions so having pockets is important (and not those pitiful tiny pockets that hold nothing, lol).

[AngelPuppy1]

I don't like pockets in clothing.  Never did.  Particularly in pants.  They never seem to lay right and somertimes add bulk and mess up the lines of the garment.  Extra bulk?  I sure don't need that!  

[CAMOGIRL]

No.

But, if there is pockets - placement and no added bulk is what I look at.

Do like them for jackets though for sure!