Fashion Question for you fashionistas

Goodie2shoes · ‎04-30-2012

I turned on QVC earlier today and saw LOGO was on. I'm not a logo buyer but they were presenting A-652813 Logo stretch lace legging for $57.98 marked down from $62 and the lace is see thru and has to be worn under a dress. They also showed it under jeans. I can't understand paying for a garment you have to wear under a dress or jeans because it's see threw ! Fashionistas is this the style now or what's the purpose ? Thanks ! and by the way, it's a no for me

DrakesMomma · ‎06-02-2010

I like wearing the cropped ones with a skirt or dress in the warm weather months when I have a lot of errands. I just worry less I'm going to give a show. Makes getting in and out of the car less worrisome.

Kachina624 · ‎03-10-2010

Lori has many unusual styles; some are hits, some are misses. IMO those legging are a definite miss and a big NO.

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment

cheriere · ‎12-01-2023

@Kachina624

I completely agree. I have some logo items, but the prices on her leggings have increased significantly. I own some of the regular ones and they're not anything special. I don't care for the lace ones either though.

Desert Lily · ‎06-24-2011

I have a pair of LOGO ivory lace leggings. I bought them to wear as hosiery under some dresses. I like them, & used as an accessory they've stepped up the look of my dress.

SaveTheTurtles · ‎10-09-2023

I can't imagine a worse fabrication for a legging than lace. Ick.

LindaSal · ‎05-15-2014

I thought they were cute and she does do excellent leggings that actually fit and are not thin. That being said, yes these were eyelet and see through but I think they would look nice with the proper length tunic. Problem is some don't know what a proper length is, LOL! For me I wouldn't wear them under a dress or jeans.

Also I wanted to add the cost of her garments now are way out of whack!

Sugipine · ‎05-22-2016

I don't like lace anything so lace leggings are definitely a big NO for me.

wagirl · ‎03-09-2010

Only if you are a 6 year old girl!! My daughter would wear stuff like that at that age. I am not a fan of that line at all----and a sale price of less than $5? QVCs idea a of sale is still in place, I see.