Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
11-26-2019 01:03 PM
A372783 This is their idea of "new" and they wonder WHY they are doing so poorly! LOL
11-26-2019 01:21 PM
Just my opinion but those are UGLY
11-26-2019 01:34 PM
11-26-2019 01:46 PM
I don't like them, but even if I did, I wouldn't pay that price! But that's me. Jeans are not a fashion item I'm willing to spend a lot on!
11-26-2019 02:05 PM - edited 11-26-2019 02:15 PM
That's an easy pass for me.
ETA: Especially at that price.
11-26-2019 04:38 PM
I don't like them. What I REALLY don't like, though, is how short they are on that
model. I don't care what the "rules" are these days but in my opinion, anything with a bootcut or flare at the bottom needs to be long enough so that the shoe isn't exposed like that. For me, it's to the ground on bootcut. If I want to show off a shoe, I wear skinny jeans or slim pants with no flare at the bottom. I do not like the flare being 8 inches off the ground. It is a very unattractive look to me. Yes, that's "to me."
11-26-2019 06:51 PM
@BrandiDavis wrote:A372783 This is their idea of "new" and they wonder WHY they are doing so poorly! LOL
Add sandles, a peasant blouse, frayed hem and a flower in my hair and I'm transported back to hippy time. Everything old is new again.
11-27-2019 11:00 AM
I had these pantts in the 70's. They were men's jeans, made by Brittiania and they were unhemmed. At 5'6" and 105 pounds there were no womens pants small enough to fit me and they were all too short. The men's were too big in the waist but the length, with boots, was amazing. Women's sizing has come a long way since then! The product description does say the inseam is 32 inches, so they won't be that short on everyone.
11-27-2019 11:44 AM
I would wear them if 1) I was 30 years younger 2) about 5'7" and about 120 lbs and 3) I had $150 bucks to blow on jeans. but, I'm late 50's, short and thick waisted and don't want to spend $150 bucks on jeans LOL I'm thinking the women like that aren't shopping on QVC.. but idk
11-27-2019 12:11 PM
Those aren't my jam and they are definitely way too short on that model.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788