Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 23,835
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

I think it is very unattractive....Lori called it “chic”

 

 

price....only $82.50😧

 

57ECD43F-3650-45A4-9BAD-2A9497775FAB.jpeg

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,371
Registered: ‎06-19-2010

Oh is that all. Guess I should get one in every color LOL

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,857
Registered: ‎06-24-2012

It's not any worse than A-310991 'twin set'.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,470
Registered: ‎01-27-2014

I like it, but I agree that the price is a little steep.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 555
Registered: ‎11-16-2014

I agree! It needs to be a lot more stylish, or tres chic, for $82.50!! 😕

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,746
Registered: ‎01-19-2015

I look for tops that are slimming and elongating. This one is just the opposite, IMO. The large, contrasting horizontal stripes at the bottom draw attention to what is a "problem" area for many of us. And the price is unattractive to me. 

~~Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the 'm' is silent.~~
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,604
Registered: ‎03-21-2017

It’s beautiful!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,721
Registered: ‎07-12-2012

@SeaMaiden wrote:

 

I think it is very unattractive....Lori called it “chic”

 

 

price....only $82.50😧

 


I agree @SeaMaiden 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,847
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

At least Susan’s off the hook this time.  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,566
Registered: ‎04-04-2014

Everyone wearing it looked like they've gained 30 lbs. If Amy and Kate can't pull it off the rest of us don't have a chance!