Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
01-14-2017 05:44 PM
@Scooby Doo wrote:It's a case of beating a dead horse, and a way for Sheen to make a buck.
01-14-2017 05:47 PM
@RainCityWoman wrote:Bring on the real kiiller then. Stop with the speculation. He had means, motive, and opportunity, AND he had priors when it came to violence toward his ex wife. There is no one else who had any motive to not only murder her, but murder an innocent man who simply had the misfortune of working at the restaurant where she left her sun glasses. I don't know how OJ lives with himself. He should have pulled the trigger in the white Bronco when he was trying to flee to Mexico.
He's a coward!
01-14-2017 05:52 PM
01-14-2017 06:15 PM
I think there was enough evidence proving he was guilty. Blood, hair and DNA.
01-14-2017 07:40 PM
01-14-2017 07:47 PM
01-14-2017 08:07 PM
@ladyroxanne wrote:maybe so @suzyQ3
sheen also had a breakdown while filming
@ladyroxanne, when Sheen came on site in the Philippines, he described it as "chaos." And he wasn't just talking about the weather. I doubt there's ever been such a chaotic, hellish, nightmare of a filming. Among all that went on, yes, Sheen suffered a heart attack,
possibly as a result of alcohol.
A 1991 documentary about the film called "Heart of Darkness: A Filmmaker's Apocalypse" chronicles the mad production of the 1971 film.
But the end result...superb.
01-14-2017 08:38 PM
Clearly there is no one else here who thinks he just might be innocent.
I don't know whether he is innocent or guilty, but I was at home with a husband who was only able to sit and watch tv. He could not speak or swallow, was paralized on one side, could not see anything to the left of center and remained that way for five years until he passed away. Very sad.
During the time the OJ trial was televised, and I can honestly say I did not miss a moment of the coverage. Was he guilty or innocent? I don't know. BUT I do know this. Regardless of his guilt or innocence the prosecution, led by what I could only say was an inept attorney, did not prove to me that OJ Simpson was guiltly.
His attorneys were very clever and effective. But if I had been sitting on that jury I absolutely would have have to find him Not Guilty, as the prosecution did not prove anything to me. I watched them make mistake after mistake. I've seen a few posts here stating things that were never stated or proven. I'm really looking forward to watching this, and comparing my own memory of the trial to what they showl Think what you will, he may well be guilty as sin, but in a murder trial I'd have to have a lot more hard evidence to find someone guilty.
Now go ahead and pan me all you llike. I'm not changing my mind until someone shows me evidence that can't be reffuted.
01-14-2017 08:51 PM
@fortune wrote:
@Scooby Doo wrote:It's a case of beating a dead horse, and a way for Sheen to make a buck.
Git Up and Giddy Up
01-14-2017 09:00 PM
@Perkup wrote:Clearly there is no one else here who thinks he just might be innocent.
I don't know whether he is innocent or guilty, but I was at home with a husband who was only able to sit and watch tv. He could not speak or swallow, was paralized on one side, could not see anything to the left of center and remained that way for five years until he passed away. Very sad.
During the time the OJ trial was televised, and I can honestly say I did not miss a moment of the coverage. Was he guilty or innocent? I don't know. BUT I do know this. Regardless of his guilt or innocence the prosecution, led by what I could only say was an inept attorney, did not prove to me that OJ Simpson was guiltly.
His attorneys were very clever and effective. But if I had been sitting on that jury I absolutely would have have to find him Not Guilty, as the prosecution did not prove anything to me. I watched them make mistake after mistake. I've seen a few posts here stating things that were never stated or proven. I'm really looking forward to watching this, and comparing my own memory of the trial to what they showl Think what you will, he may well be guilty as sin, but in a murder trial I'd have to have a lot more hard evidence to find someone guilty.
Now go ahead and pan me all you llike. I'm not changing my mind until someone shows me evidence that can't be reffuted.
Who do you think did it and what was their motive?
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788