Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,238
Registered: ‎08-22-2013

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

[ Edited ]

I was actually unsure of if he was guilty or not.  However, sometime after the trial one of the entertainment shows aired a clip of OJ from a foreign talk show (like in Europe.)  As part of the show, the host would open the door to reveal her guest.  In this case, she opened the door and OJ had a banana in his hand making stabbing motions with it like he was going to knife her.  He was grinning the whole time.  I know it doesn't prove anything but it made me think he was guilty, otherwise how could he make fun of the murder of his children's mother. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 40,248
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?


@fortune wrote:

@mousiegirl wrote:

@fortune wrote:

@RainCityWoman wrote:

It was done by Johnny Cochran, not the prosecution. It was Johnny who said "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit," and OJ played it to the hilt "struggling" to put on gloves that had been soaked in blood previously. There was still a preponderance of evidence, even a bloody fingerprint on the gate that was entirely ignored by the LAPD. The getaway alone when he escaped a meeting with his lawyer should have been introduced as well. The sad thing is an innocent young man's death has been all but ignored here in this. OJ is not even serving time for that, and you can bet that young man fought like hell for his life and was cast aside to lie in a pool of his own blood. And by the way, this trial may have turned into a trial about race by the defense, but it was really about the culture of personality and celebrity. Judge ito was really affected by the celeb aspect of it.


@RainCityWoman

What was very strange to me is how hard Ron and Nicole fought (from pictures of their autopsies) and O.J. only had a cut on his finger.  Otherwise, all the other evidence points to him as the killer.


 

@fortune  They didn't fight, only cuts to the hands, natural defensive wounds.  Ron and Nicole had no weapon, and were taken so by surprise.

 

If you google simulated murder scene Ron and Nicole by OJ Simpson or some similar wording, you can view the video of what law enforcement believes happened that night.


@mousiegirl

Ron's hands were a mess, according to the pics I saw.  But the main thing is MOTIVE.  His son or a stranger didn't have a motive to brutally kill two people!!!


 

@fortune  Right, defensive wounds, not attacking wounds.  He was being stabbed nonstop, dying all the time, bleeding internally.  Watch the simulation video. Smiley Happy  It's shameful that Jason is being dragged into this.  He loved Nicole by all accounts and had no motive whatsoever.  The show was cr--p!

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,007
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

Has it been mentioned yet that one of the guys "investigating" on this show, Derrick, the police officer from Rhode Island, was last on television on Big Brother, and won that season?  Somehow seeing him on this show made it all the less credible and just a bunch of people trying to make some money.

It's like they saw the success of the JonBennet shows and figured they would give it a try.

 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,812
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

@mousiegirl

 

also, ron's throat was slit

Valued Contributor
Posts: 639
Registered: ‎12-30-2016

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

I didn't expect OJ to have a lot of injuries.   He had a knife and came at Nicole from behind.   He was wearing gloves.  He could have worn a helmet for all we know or some

other type of face covering.   He knew he had to get on a plane that night.   

Honored Contributor
Posts: 40,248
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

[ Edited ]

@ladyroxanne wrote:

@mousiegirl

 

also, ron's throat was slit


 

@ladyroxanne  According to the information, this was further into the attack.  The whole point is that Ron and Nicole never had a chance to fight back.  The simulated video is enlightening to those who have many questions.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,812
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

@mousiegirl

 

ita!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,436
Registered: ‎03-20-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

Some talk like they were there.  The similated animation of what the LAPD thought could have happened is not proof positive and only speculation!!  Also, how would anyone here know his son loved Nicole - only speculation. It sounds like it's been verified that his son had a Jekyll/Hyde personality disorder and off his meds at the time.  I think it's documented that he threatened to slit his girlfriend's throat and carried a knife and was in many fights.  Goldman supposedly was a black belt in some sort of  martial art so he probably did manage to inflict some sort of injury on the killer!!  Not one of us was there but there is enough evidence being verified that says OJ did not do it.  This documentary is not just speculation but many things now verified that the LAPD should have done!!!    

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,812
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?

ok @Pook

Honored Contributor
Posts: 40,248
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: What if O.J. Simpson is innocent?


@Pook wrote:

Some talk like they were there.  The similated animation of what the LAPD thought could have happened is not proof positive and only speculation!!  Also, how would anyone here know his son loved Nicole - only speculation. It sounds like it's been verified that his son had a Jekyll/Hyde personality disorder and off his meds at the time.  I think it's documented that he threatened to slit his girlfriend's throat and carried a knife and was in many fights.  Goldman supposedly was a black belt in some sort of  martial art so he probably did manage to inflict some sort of injury on the killer!!  Not one of us was there but there is enough evidence being verified that says OJ did not do it.  This documentary is not just speculation but many things now verified that the LAPD should have done!!!    

 

@Pook  Jason's blood wasn't found, only Simpson, Ron, and Nicole's.  I believe the mountain of evidence,  and watched the entire debacle of a trial.

 

How did Ron inflict injury on Simpson with no weapon, and repeatedly being stabbed, all the while dying from internal bleeding, ridiculous.

 

There couldn't have been more evidence against Simpson other than a camera showing him murdering Ron and Nicole.