Venting About Reduced Lunch in School Program - Page 7

AngusandBuddhasMom · ‎03-10-2010

@Isobel Archer wrote:
For people who essentially object to there being any rules concerning free lunch - i.e., all children should automatically get it because otherwise, parents might not provide it, I ask this.

Would you personally be willing to provide dinner every night to neghbor children whose parents didn't feel like cooking - because otherwise they would go hungry?

If not, what is your logic for insisting the taxpayer should?

As I stated I live in one of the highest if not the highest property taxed county in NJ. I have no problem that my $$ goes to providing free lunches or breakfast. My G-d we are talking about children.

I raised my DD as a single parent I never thank G-d needed this service but I know those that did and I am happy that we in a lot of communites not only provide them during the school year but also in the summer. This is not what is wrong with the economy.

Why is it always the least among us that get dragged up and questioned first?

Mj12 · ‎03-09-2010

@eddyandme wrote:
I don't believe in "free" lunches. People on Welfare get monies for groceries, etc. And, for those not being subsidized, there are food banks. They can always make sure their children have a healthy lunch. There is no shame in bringing one's lunch to school, work, whatever. Seems like the free lunch program attracts those too lazy to make a lunch for their child and/or those who think they can scam the system.

Not every parent is responsible. Not every parent packs their kids lunches - or even cares if they are dressed properly or get off to school safely. For some kids - this is the only real meal they get.

RazorSharp · ‎02-20-2016

@eddyandme wrote:

@RazorSharp wrote:
@eddyandme wrote:
I don't believe in "free" lunches. People on Welfare get monies for groceries, etc. And, for those not being subsidized, there are food banks. They can always make sure their children have a healthy lunch. There is no shame in bringing one's lunch to school, work, whatever. Seems like the free lunch program attracts those too lazy to make a lunch for their child and/or those who think they can scam the system.
@eddyandme Then, why should the schools provide lunch? By your estimation, all the parents have the time and ability to pack a lunch for kids, right?
@RazorSharp

Right. It's called handling your responsibilities.

Yeah, and if the parents suck, let the kids go hungry, right? Nice.

tansy · ‎01-02-2011

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:
@Isobel Archer wrote:
For people who essentially object to there being any rules concerning free lunch - i.e., all children should automatically get it because otherwise, parents might not provide it, I ask this.

Would you personally be willing to provide dinner every night to neghbor children whose parents didn't feel like cooking - because otherwise they would go hungry?

If not, what is your logic for insisting the taxpayer should?
As I stated I live in one of the highest if not the highest property taxed county in NJ. I have no problem that my $$ goes to providing free lunches or breakfast. My G-d we are talking about children.
I raised my DD as a single parent I never thank G-d needed this service but I know those that did and I am happy that we in a lot of communites not only provide them during the school year but also in the summer. This is not what is wrong with the economy.
Why is it always the least among us that get dragged up and questioned first?

Cara, your last statement is perfect.

DoneTryin · ‎03-09-2010

I'd probably feel the way same way if I were in your position.

If some property taxes are applied toward the district's schools, then the parents are paying that way, which doesn't excuse fraud.

I think all kids should get free lunches at school, but it really boils down to the local economy & how much money the schools have, or get, to spend on lunches.

violann · ‎03-10-2010

@Snowpuppy wrote:
I work with women who sign their kids up for free lunch simply because, well, it's free and no documentation is required. There's no way they qualify.

They also sign them up for Head Start because well, since documentation of income is required then surely they're learning disabled, right? Actually, they use it as free day care for at least part of their work day.

Head Start is not designed for children with learning disabilities. Could you amplify on the meaning of your statement please?

There also is not any legal reason why a parent couldn't be employed during Head Start hours, except for the necessary documentation to certify financial eligibility for Head Start program guidelines.

eddyandme · ‎09-24-2011

@JillyMarie wrote:
@eddyandme wrote:
I don't believe in "free" lunches. People on Welfare get monies for groceries, etc. And, for those not being subsidized, there are food banks. They can always make sure their children have a healthy lunch. There is no shame in bringing one's lunch to school, work, whatever. Seems like the free lunch program attracts those too lazy to make a lunch for their child and/or those who think they can scam the system.
Does your belief encompass all parents and their children in America?

@JillyMarie

Definitely.

AngusandBuddhasMom · ‎03-10-2010

@tansy wrote:
@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:
@Isobel Archer wrote:
For people who essentially object to there being any rules concerning free lunch - i.e., all children should automatically get it because otherwise, parents might not provide it, I ask this.

Would you personally be willing to provide dinner every night to neghbor children whose parents didn't feel like cooking - because otherwise they would go hungry?

If not, what is your logic for insisting the taxpayer should?
As I stated I live in one of the highest if not the highest property taxed county in NJ. I have no problem that my $$ goes to providing free lunches or breakfast. My G-d we are talking about children.
I raised my DD as a single parent I never thank G-d needed this service but I know those that did and I am happy that we in a lot of communites not only provide them during the school year but also in the summer. This is not what is wrong with the economy.
Why is it always the least among us that get dragged up and questioned first?
Cara, your last statement is perfect.