Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,829
Registered: ‎03-18-2010
On 2/16/2015 brii said: I don't believe Cindy looks that bad in real life. I think they made her look worse.

I agree Brii. I am not sure if they intended to try and make her look worse but I have seen so many pictures and videos of Cindy Crawford in the last 1-2 yrs in her bikini and she looks great. I think the lighting in these pictures is horrible and it is making her look like she has severe sun damage and she absolutely does not. I am not saying she looks horrible in this pictures because she doesn't but she does look much better than these photos indicate. It almost looks like these photos are mixed with a UV light that derms use to see future sun damage.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK
Super Contributor
Posts: 632
Registered: ‎06-26-2014
On 2/16/2015 happy housewife said:

This is the way a real woman who has had children looks as she enters middle age. Her face doesn't match - DUH - makeup!! So many women in this country think the images they see ion the magazines of models and stars are real and achievable and they are so wrong. Everyone ages - the only real way to reverse it is surgery.

You make it sound like she looks awful. Have you seen middle age men in bathing suits?

There is absolutely nothing wrong with looking like this. You do not need to wear one of those sack like swim dresses just because you are over 40.

Super Contributor
Posts: 256
Registered: ‎03-23-2010
Oh wow looking at the first pic I feel pretty darn good about my body at 54.
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,731
Registered: ‎04-12-2011

Even Cindy Crawford said once that she wished she looked like Cindy Crawford, LOL.

I feel the shadows/lighting on the magazine photo may make it a little look worse than it is but even so, it is not all that bad, not at all.

Super Contributor
Posts: 490
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

The skin below her bust area looks more like that of a 66 year old woman. Clothes hide a multitude of sins. Just because you are thin doesn't mean things are pretty sans clothing, especially after 40. {#emotions_dlg.scared} I've seen other celebs in beach photos and it was shocking. A lot of them were younger than Cindy.

Super Contributor
Posts: 783
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Untouched photos, with obvious skin damage on her legs too. The real deal for a change. {#emotions_dlg.rolleyes}

Regular Contributor
Posts: 238
Registered: ‎01-13-2015

Too much sun damage. So much for her miracle working skincare line.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,774
Registered: ‎10-05-2010
Well, if that first picture is due to bad lighting, where can we buy some of that good lighting from the tweeted pic lol
Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,976
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Oh geesh ladies. Now I can see why people retouch their photos. I think she is fine, she is human...makes her more endearing.

When a woman looks good, immediately women snipe that it is photo shopped picture, or they had a lift or some surgery. Or if they had the money they to could look that good. Then an untouched, phto is released and women are so happy to pick them apart and find fault with every flaw.

JMHO

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,839
Registered: ‎03-10-2010
On 2/16/2015 Danky said: I think she doesn't have a well-aged body at all. She was only 46 in this picture and from under her breasts on down I think she looks very old....

Hi Danky

I am glad all is well now and I thought you and ....

might like this http://community.qvc.com/forums/viewpoints/topic/493458/postid/10315437/re-manhattan-one-bedroom-ap...

Stay well

Java