Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
-
Blogs & Forums
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
Obviously. 
The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
on the contrary............opposing views are always helpful.........it sometimes is the delivery that needs fine tweeking.........................................raven
The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
Did you see my earlier post to you, dooB?? I wouldn't worry about this at all.The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
i'm guessin it wasn't the message...........it was the messenger...............................raven
Wrong, again. But I do think in your case that is the problem here. Were I here with a "new" name, posting an argument against Noel, instead of being me, in agreement with her, I suspect your view would be different. C'est la vie.
<br /> Lumming's article was from the CDC.
Hi, Scottie! Actually it's an opinion piece on a coupon website. Someone's interpretation of what they read from sources like the CDC and others.
ummmmmmmm not it's not, it's an article from Medical News Today.......now that other site may have copied and pasted it to their site............gee where have we seen that done..................by the way I put "opinion piece right along there next to troll................................................raven
I didn't see any credits for another author, just some sources cited (listed at the bottom), so perhaps they did a cut-and-paste and added their own comments also. As for opinion pieces, they can be very different from scientific or carefully researched articles. But then, I come from both an arts and a science background, so I can appreciate both. That's why we all (including moi
then get the information from the FDA......you know those crazy bloggers.............raven
http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/consumerupdates/ucm092815.htm
Thank you raven. Good link also. Hmmmm. Maybe there is something to this not washing business. YUCK! 
I am just now getting used to the idea you don't have to cook pork until it is shoe leather ROFL!
Did you see my earlier post to you, dooB?? I wouldn't worry about this at all.The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
I'm not worried. Just amused at the usual stuff.
Good :-)Did you see my earlier post to you, dooB?? I wouldn't worry about this at all.The bottom line is the article in question pretty much agreed with your POV DooB. So, I don't get you disdain for it.
I didn't mention a disdain for the specific article. I posted a follow-up to my previous comments, since it seemed helpful to do so. Obviously, I was wrong to try. Obviously, opposing views on this thread aren't welcome.
I'm not worried. Just amused at the usual stuff.
Footer Navigation and Information
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Manage Your Account
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Get More with QCard®
Enjoy 12+ VIP Savings Events a year (& more!).
Work with Us
Stay Connected
Download Our QVC Apps
This is Shopping Brought to Life.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788