Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 30,916
Registered: ‎05-10-2010

@SahmIam wrote:

Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

 

1) The back pocket detail

 

2) The waistband detail

 

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

 

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.

 

 

 

 

Yes, indeed.  But some people were intrigued with Kim's posterior and and that's all they saw.  And apparently, they spent a LOT of time staring at it.  


 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,846
Registered: ‎04-23-2010

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

 

Generally speaking, I'm not crazy about any photo where a woman wears something tight .....  and looks like a stuffed sausage.  It IS tacky.   JMO.

 


I have never heard that tacky phrase directed toward a male. JMO

“The soul is healed by being with children.”
— Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,237
Registered: ‎03-29-2011

Re: TSV complaints

[ Edited ]

@mom2four0418 wrote:

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

 

Generally speaking, I'm not crazy about any photo where a woman wears something tight .....  and looks like a stuffed sausage.  It IS tacky.   JMO.

 


I have never heard that tacky phrase directed toward a male. JMO


I've never seen a picture on the QVC homepage of a man's butt stuffed into skin tight pants similar to this.

 

Today's Special Value® — Belle by Kim Gravel Flexibelle Slim Waist Jeggings

Super Contributor
Posts: 252
Registered: ‎05-29-2010

The pic is large. Smacks you right as you scroll down the page.  She is sandwiched into those pants that look to be 2 sizes to small.  Not attractive at all. 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,170
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

People should not be shamed for body type... totally rude.  We cannot all be a size 2.  We are who we are and should be accepted and judged by what we do to help others, size does not count.  

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,925
Registered: ‎06-13-2010

It was not a naked hiney, so I was not offended by that graphic in the least😉.

 

 

~~~All we need is LOVE💖

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,241
Registered: ‎12-05-2012

@SahmIam wrote:

Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

 

1) The back pocket detail

 

2) The waistband detail

 

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

 

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.


Agreed...and after seeing that shot I went from somewhat interested to pass. Not for me!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 41,253
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

its a jegging.......they are not supposed to be a loose fit.

they may not be for everyone, but i thought that they looked great on her.

no issues at all with the photo that shows detail on the product.

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,928
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

 

 

I see nothing offensive about the photo, but it does make me reconsider eating more salads.  PS I don't think I know who Kim Gravel is. I thought her name was a misprint (Graver). 

"That's a great first pancake."
Lady Gaga, to Tony Bennett
Super Contributor
Posts: 252
Registered: ‎05-29-2010

Re: TSV complaints

[ Edited ]

Her name is Kim Gravel.  Her line of clothing is called Belle by Kim Gravel.  She is not related to the designer named Graver.


@sunala wrote:

 

 

I see nothing offensive about the photo, but it does make me reconsider eating more salads.  PS I don't think I know who Kim Gravel is. I thought her name was a misprint (Graver).