Reply
Valued Contributor
Posts: 533
Registered: ‎04-21-2012

I so totally agree.  I have nothing against butts but I do find it horribly offensive to turn on QVC first thing in the morning and having this butt close up staring me in the face.....this close up is not an attractive picture of a butt - especially screetching KG.  Show some class QVC!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,148
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@mom2four0418 wrote:

@Imaoldhippie wrote:

I find it odd people are complaining about a fully clothed picture of a tush.  No complaints when they have models in bras and panties.


I wonder if the negative reaction would have been the same if she was a size 2.


 

So true on both counts!  I think the photo is fine (it is showing the back and pockets), and she looks good.  Of all the things to find "disturbing".Woman Surprised

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,789
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

Some of you must have a very large monitor:/

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,749
Registered: ‎11-16-2014

It is bad enough that Kim is in your face when she is on air, now we have to be treated to a photo of her in your face butt. Enough already!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,910
Registered: ‎05-08-2017

@tansy wrote:

Some of you must have a very large monitor:/

 

 


 

😂🤣😁😄

Honored Contributor
Posts: 9,139
Registered: ‎04-16-2010

Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

 

1) The back pocket detail

 

2) The waistband detail

 

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

 

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,739
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@Trinity11  you nailed it

Honored Contributor
Posts: 46,920
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

 

Generally speaking, I'm not crazy about any photo where a woman wears something tight .....  and looks like a stuffed sausage.  It IS tacky.   JMO.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,440
Registered: ‎03-20-2010

But yet when a rear picture of the Spanx jeans there were no complaints!!!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,152
Registered: ‎02-05-2018

@SahmIam wrote:

Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

 

1) The back pocket detail

 

2) The waistband detail

 

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

 

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.


Agreed. It serves a purpose.

She's fully clothed and looks good. There's nothing lewd or inappropriate about it and I think it's a shame some people find it offensive.