SHAME ON TOM CRUISE IF... - Page 2

Lindsays Grandma · ‎03-10-2010

wrote:
@Lindsays GrandmaWhy would anyone care about Tom Cruise? He put his crazy religion before his marriage and family. If other information is correct about the divorce stating "no public dating for five years" then he gave up all rights to Suri a very long time ago IMO. Sounds like Tom planted the rumors you are passing. He's a dispicable human being and should rot in you know where. Confident Suri is healthy, happy and very well-adjusted within a loving home of Jami Foxx and her mom, who fought long and hard to protect Suri. Sounds like Tom is going through another of his over zealous, over religious Daddy-O moments of jealousy, which will be short lived.

It has nothing to do with caring about Tom Cruise...it has everything to do with a little girl who wants to see her father!!!

The moving finger writes; And having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line Nor all your Tears Wash out a Word of it. Omar Khayam

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
wrote:
It’s about a child wanting her father to show her love, the celeb part doesn’t matter.
Thank you for seeing it for what it is.

😊

BirkiLady · ‎02-22-2015

Doubt that Suri has any idea what transpired throughout the dissolution of the marriage and the divorce decree. Nor would she understand the settlement - or what it must have cost Tom to get a Judge to agree to such nonsense. This information is adult business. Parents do not share it with their children. Suri has no clue and wouldn't understand the ramification even if someone tried to explain it all. It's such a crazy mess. Let the press have a field day. If Suri really has questions, I'm confident she would have been taken to the best therapist in town immediately. This is not for the public to judge or play Jury.

Money screams; wealth whispers.

MoJoV · ‎10-01-2010

I kind of think with the irrational beliefs of Tom's the child may be better off not seeing him. It's an awful thing to say but I've seen Leah Remini (sp?) interview some people who were children in that group. Not pretty.

Trees are the lungs of the Earth

Blingqueen023 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
Why get emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.

I totally agree. I'm glad I don't have that obession.

occasionalrain · ‎03-10-2010

Unlikely. I suspect Katie and/or Jamie are behind this rumor.

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
Doubt that Suri has any idea what transpired throughout the dissolution of the marriage and the divorce decree. Nor would she understand the settlement - or what it must have cost Tom to get a Judge to agree to such nonsense. This information is adult business. Parents do not share it with their children. Suri has no clue and wouldn't understand the ramification even if someone tried to explain it all. It's such a crazy mess. Let the press have a field day. If Suri really has questions, I'm confident she would have been taken to the best therapist in town immediately. This is not for the public to judge or play Jury.

I don’t think this has anything to do with questions, she just wants to see her daddy.

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
wrote:
Why get emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.
I totally agree. I'm glad I don't have that obession.

It’s not about celebs. Good grief.

Blingqueen023 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Why get emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.
I totally agree. I'm glad I don't have that obession.

It’s not about celebs. Good grief.

It sure is. Good Grief

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Why get emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.
I totally agree. I'm glad I don't have that obession.

It’s not about celebs. Good grief.
It sure is. Good Grief

No, it’s not. Some people care about children, no matter who they are. Obviously some other people know almost nothing about children and couldn’t care less.