Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,715
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

JUST SILLY.

When you lose some one you L~O~V~E, that Memory of them, becomes a TREASURE.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,836
Registered: ‎06-17-2015

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

[ Edited ]

@cherry wrote:

@I think Meghan is a Brit in her heart, by choice.   From everything I have read she  was an avid Anglophile before she ever moved to the UK. SO I agree with @JANE MARPLE, she is British by heart, and choice. It's a done deal

 

I can't imagine why she would want to have her baby here? Especially with that Markle family on the loose..That creepy bunch would never be out of the news,  if she had her baby in the USA. They manage to get into the news enough ,living an ocean away


@cherry   No.  Until Meghan renounces her US citizenship, she is still a citizen of this country.  Jane is incorrect.

 

Meghan is also still subject to US taxes, too.  Which means all finances are subject to inspection-including royal finances.  Our country requires IRS tax filings regardless of where the US citizen lives. 

 

  This is a legal issue, not a heart issue.

 

Her choice is based on love, not because he's British, too.

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,739
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

@ Cakers I was speaking of her feelings..that is what matters to me. I don't think she cares about US citizenship. If I were in her shoes I wouldn't, either

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,447
Registered: ‎01-22-2016

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

T6jghOC.gif

Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,488
Registered: ‎04-18-2013

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

Next news story - 

 

"HARRY GOES HOLLYWOOD!"

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,658
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?

In the UK, Meghan, Harry and baby have much more protection and privacy from prying eyes and paparazzi.

 

They may visit the US, but I don't see them 'living' here.

 

I also don't see the Queen allowing royal assets of any royal family members to be disclosed to the US IRS.

 

I think Meghan will eventually denounce her US citizenship, for this reason, among others.

You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have.
Super Contributor
Posts: 318
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?


@Mlsg wrote:

@Lindsays Grandma wrote:

As I was scrolling news reports the following headline caught my eye...

 

Meghan wants the baby to be born in Los Angeles.  It went on to say that Meghan and Harry are checking out hospitals and are interested in Mount Sinai where Beyonce had her twins. 

 

Being born in America will automatically give the child American citizenship.  They also want to buy a house in Los Angeles where the child (and/or future children) can spend a lot of time while growing up.  One specification is that the child be educated in England.

                                  ------

Personally, I doubt the Queen will be very happy with the news.  I would imagine she will not approve of it and just might tell them they cannot do it.  Of course Meghan and Harry can turn around and tell her it is their child and they can do what they want, however, the Queen can say it is her great grandchild and it will be born in England, down comes the hammer, bang, so be it!!!!!!!   There is a price to pay when displeasing the Queen, therefore, no one does it.  More drama!!!



It’s already not truth, LA does not have hospital named Mount Sinai.New York has. So who crieated this did not do homework.

 


The post said  CEDARS SINAI not Mount Sinai.  There is indeed a CEDARS SINAI IN LOS ANGELES.   Apparently you didn't do YOUR homework.

Super Contributor
Posts: 318
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?


@wingnut wrote:

@Mlsg wrote:

@Lindsays Grandma wrote:

As I was scrolling news reports the following headline caught my eye...

 

Meghan wants the baby to be born in Los Angeles.  It went on to say that Meghan and Harry are checking out hospitals and are interested in Mount Sinai where Beyonce had her twins. 

 

Being born in America will automatically give the child American citizenship.  They also want to buy a house in Los Angeles where the child (and/or future children) can spend a lot of time while growing up.  One specification is that the child be educated in England.

                                  ------

Personally, I doubt the Queen will be very happy with the news.  I would imagine she will not approve of it and just might tell them they cannot do it.  Of course Meghan and Harry can turn around and tell her it is their child and they can do what they want, however, the Queen can say it is her great grandchild and it will be born in England, down comes the hammer, bang, so be it!!!!!!!   There is a price to pay when displeasing the Queen, therefore, no one does it.  More drama!!!



It’s already not truth, LA does not have hospital named Mount Sinai.New York has. So who crieated this did not do homework.

 


 


 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,681
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?


@wingnut wrote:

@Mlsg wrote:

@Lindsays Grandma wrote:

As I was scrolling news reports the following headline caught my eye...

 

Meghan wants the baby to be born in Los Angeles.  It went on to say that Meghan and Harry are checking out hospitals and are interested in Mount Sinai where Beyonce had her twins. 

 

Being born in America will automatically give the child American citizenship.  They also want to buy a house in Los Angeles where the child (and/or future children) can spend a lot of time while growing up.  One specification is that the child be educated in England.

                                  ------

Personally, I doubt the Queen will be very happy with the news.  I would imagine she will not approve of it and just might tell them they cannot do it.  Of course Meghan and Harry can turn around and tell her it is their child and they can do what they want, however, the Queen can say it is her great grandchild and it will be born in England, down comes the hammer, bang, so be it!!!!!!!   There is a price to pay when displeasing the Queen, therefore, no one does it.  More drama!!!



It’s already not truth, LA does not have hospital named Mount Sinai.New York has. So who crieated this did not do homework.

 


The post said  CEDARS SINAI not Mount Sinai.  There is indeed a CEDARS SINAI IN LOS ANGELES.   Apparently you didn't do YOUR homework.


@wingnutactually the original post was edited to change Mount Sinai to Cedars Sinai. even your quote shows the original way it was written with  "Mount Sinai."  see above. just clarifying.   and yes there is a well-known Cedars Sinai here in L.A. as you said.   

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,085
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: ROYAL BABY TO BE BORN IN LOS ANGELES?


@topcat10 wrote:

I seriously doubt that she wants her child to be born in LA as opposed to the UK....FAKE NEWS!


That was a good one.  Thanks for the laugh.