Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,462
Registered: ‎03-13-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

It's been this way ever since the Q team joined the forums.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,095
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

On 10/1/2014 brii said:

I'm hesitant to name names of missing posters.

I don't want to get banned.

I think if one atmits having been banned...they will get the permanent boot.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

**Careful... I have caps lock and I am not afraid to use it.**
Honored Contributor
Posts: 33,580
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

Maybe the agenda here is to monitor the boards so closely that posters get tired of it, quit posting and the boards end up so dead, Q does away with them stating there was a lack of interest.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,614
Registered: ‎03-12-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

On 10/1/2014 croemer said:
On 10/1/2014 brii said:

I'm hesitant to name names of missing posters.

I don't want to get banned.

I think if one atmits having been banned...they will get the permanent boot.

It seems that way because both posters who just used a derivative of their nic were gone quickly. I guess banning now is a permanent decision on the part of QVC.

In order for it to be permanent that must mean they ban the IP on the poster so they cannot post any longer?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,126
Registered: ‎06-20-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

I know the other forums - fashion, beauty, home, kitchen - get a lot of activity.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 33,580
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

Fashion seems very dead to me lately.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,095
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

On 10/1/2014 SoftRaindrops said:
On 10/1/2014 croemer said:
On 10/1/2014 brii said:

I'm hesitant to name names of missing posters.

I don't want to get banned.

I think if one atmits having been banned...they will get the permanent boot.

It seems that way because both posters who just used a derivative of their nic were gone quickly. I guess banning now is a permanent decision on the part of QVC.

In order for it to be permanent that must mean they ban the IP on the poster so they cannot post any longer?

I believe so SoftRain.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

**Careful... I have caps lock and I am not afraid to use it.**
Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,126
Registered: ‎06-20-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

If they are banning posters, temporarily or permanently, what is the criteria?

The Standards alone are very broad and can be interpreted from mod to mod.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,832
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

I love you guys!

I post in a couple of other places on the web but this is my favorite.

I will try to "" bustle with activity and be more exciting""

I promise!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,126
Registered: ‎06-20-2010

Re: RE: thread about forums not bustling with activity

On 10/1/2014 LipstickDiva said:

Fashion seems very dead to me lately.


They poof at the drop of a hat - especially upcoming TSV's and links from other sites.

They still have more activity than Viewpoints does, IMO.