Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
08-17-2016 05:49 PM
@chickenbutt wrote:ITA about professional athletes (those for whom performing their sports is how they make their living).
I wonder when and why this took a turn. It seems to be expanding. I remember first noticing it with basketball teams.
It was always so very specific for as long as I can remember that professional athletes were not qualified to compete in the Olympics.
I think this finally came to a head when our college basketball players kept coming up against Russia's professional team. It was like David and Goliath.
Coach Dean Smith (a personal hero & a FINE person) was the last coach I remember coaching such a pro v/s college team. The USA won, but from then on it was pretty much pros.
It was of special interest to me because many of the basketball players came from my university. I loved seeing the non-pro players.
Sad, but no one is going to keep playing against such inequities..
08-17-2016 05:52 PM - edited 08-17-2016 05:59 PM
Professionals in the Games
"The International Olympic Committee eliminated the necessity of amateurism in 1971, allowing athletes to receive compensation for time away from work during training and competition.
In addition, athletes were permitted to receive sponsorship from national organizations, sports organizations, and private businesses for the first time.
In 1986, professional athletes were given permission by the International Federation to compete in each sport of the Olympic Games.
For instance, in the 1992 Olympic Games, the United States was allowed to field a basketball team comprised of well-paid NBA stars, called 'The Dream Team.'"
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/olympic-athletes.html
08-17-2016 06:29 PM
hckynut----You are exactly right. That is how this whole thing started. We were trying to level the plain field, so to speak. So those of you complaining would rather we send college kids and the other countries send professionals? How is that good competition? We are not going to ba able to change what the other countries do.
08-17-2016 09:57 PM
Here's an example of what I don't like using figure skating as an example:
A skater wins an Olympic medal or two, then retires for 2- 3 years. About 1 year before the next Olympics, that skater decides to come out of *retirement* and compete in their country's qualifying competitions in order to go to the Olympics.
This now bumps out a younger skater who has also dreamt all their life of going to the Olympics. I just don't think that is right. And with the passing of time, that former champion may not make the podium again anyway.
Rant over!
08-18-2016 12:42 AM
@castlenv wrote:IMO all elilte athletes are professionals. College students get scholarship, i.e., paid to play for their school, sponsorships by private individuals, etc. etc. Money is always involved. No such thing as an "amateur" anymore.
ITA.
That's exactly why I stopped watching the Olympics many, many years ago. With the endorsements & drugs, it's leaves me with a really icky feeling. All those Under Armour, Milk, Subway, etc advertisements playing non-stop before the games even begin? Yeah, I'm convinced they're getting a huge kick back. They're basically 'entertainers' vying for Network Ratings.
08-18-2016 11:02 AM
The Olympics lost me when the "pros from Dover" came in to ruin skating. Okay, you had the French and Russian judges colluding, but when the pros returned to capture their former Olympic glory, they took all of the medals. Those that came in fourth, fifth and sixth were cheated out of their medals. Then the pros flooded other sports, and I thought it was nothing more than cheating. I watched a few skating routines during the winter games when the American guy won the gold, but I haven't really turned in since the Atlanta games in 1996.
It doesn't help that I think NBC is one of the worst networks to cover the Olympics.
08-18-2016 11:54 AM
@madzonie wrote:This may have been discussed previously, but I just had to get something off my chest.
I remember when the Olympics used to be so strict about no "pro" athletes competing in what is supposed to be the ultimte in amatuer sports. But slowly through the years, the powers in charge decided paid athletes would bring more interest....and more money....to the show.
Mix in TV and lucrative endorsements and commercials, over-the-top Hollywood-style opening ceremonies and we now have an event that no longer seems to showcase those dedicated and talented amatuer atheletes around the world.
One vivid recollection of this transition was when the so-called "dream team" pro basketball team went to Barcelona in 1992. They were cocky and self-assured and acted like they couldn't be beaten. I remember being a bit embarassed for our country at their behavior.
Another vivd memory of mine was when the amateur U.S. ice hockey team won gold at Lake Placid in the 1980 Winter Olympics. They were the "Do you believe in miracles?" team that was cherished because they won when they were said to have no chance.
Now there are professional golfers, soccer & basketball players, tennis champs and on and on...
This kind of makes me miss the old days.
This has been going on for a while, so I'm surprised you are suddenly upset about it.
Practicing to become Olympic-worthy is not cheap! It takes years of training, practice and a good support system of adults around them!
Sports of any kind is a money making opportunity. If the Americans adhered to using only "amateur" athletes and every other country participating brought in professionals, would you think this is how we should approach this?
08-18-2016 12:00 PM
The good old days??
The disparity between male and female athletes and sports as well as supposed lucrative contracts, stipends is huge.
A lot of athletes make zilch pursuing their Olympic goals and they are not Gov't sponsored or come from wealthy families. So whatever money they make good for them.
The good old days meant everyone who was a successful athlete outside the USA was making money and ours were not.
I see nobody complaining about our professional college football and basketball players ...
08-18-2016 12:41 PM
If so inclined an interesting read is at Smithsonianmag.com,"Why are Jim Thorpe's Olympic Records Still Not Recognized?
08-18-2016 01:17 PM
@madzonie wrote:This may have been discussed previously, but I just had to get something off my chest.
I remember when the Olympics used to be so strict about no "pro" athletes competing in what is supposed to be the ultimte in amatuer sports. But slowly through the years, the powers in charge decided paid athletes would bring more interest....and more money....to the show.
Mix in TV and lucrative endorsements and commercials, over-the-top Hollywood-style opening ceremonies and we now have an event that no longer seems to showcase those dedicated and talented amatuer atheletes around the world.
One vivid recollection of this transition was when the so-called "dream team" pro basketball team went to Barcelona in 1992. They were cocky and self-assured and acted like they couldn't be beaten. I remember being a bit embarassed for our country at their behavior.
Another vivd memory of mine was when the amateur U.S. ice hockey team won gold at Lake Placid in the 1980 Winter Olympics. They were the "Do you believe in miracles?" team that was cherished because they won when they were said to have no chance.
Now there are professional golfers, soccer & basketball players, tennis champs and on and on...
This kind of makes me miss the old days.
I'm not sure exactly when it changed for the United States, but the complaint always was that our athletes had to be amateurs who weren't paid for their sport, but East Germany, USSR, and eastern block countries subsidized everything in their athletes' lives. They were the elite of their society. Hence, the rules changed as sports in the Olympics expanded.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788