Prince Andrew - Page 19

lgfan · ‎10-19-2012

@Cakers3 wrote:
The thread can certainly "broaden" regarding Charles and his mother since the roles of each Royal play into the Andrew saga.

Wickless candles and jam is not "broadening" the discussion.

I stand by my post. Like it or not.

Perhaps some need to practice what they preach and skip over what they do not like, just as I was "scolded" to do.

I have no idea if Andrew was brought up on any thread about MM. I find those threads just nonsense gossip and I do not bother with them.

So have at it. The fact that there are now multiple posts about mine says much about not letting go.🙄

Have a wonderful day.

There is a big difference between telling people to start a new thread and saying a person doesn't care about sex trafficking victims because they bring up candles and jam.

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@Cakers3 wrote:
The thread can certainly "broaden" regarding Charles and his mother since the roles of each Royal play into the Andrew saga.

Wickless candles and jam is not "broadening" the discussion.

I stand by my post. Like it or not.

Perhaps some need to practice what they preach and skip over what they do not like, just as I was "scolded" to do.

I have no idea if Andrew was brought up on any thread about MM. I find those threads just nonsense gossip and I do not bother with them.

So have at it. The fact that there are now multiple posts about mine says much about not letting go.🙄

Have a wonderful day.

I didn’t realize there was a rulebook on what’s allowed to broaden a conversation.

That’s literally what broaden means, it gets broad. That could mean anything. That’s the point.

shoekitty · ‎03-10-2010

@KKJ wrote:
@Cakers3 wrote:
This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse.

Not about wickless candles and bad tasting jam.

It shows how much some really give a flying fig about victims.
It doesn't MATTER who started it. This isn't kindergarten.
The whole MM obsession matters more???

Every day I learn just who cares about victims around here.

#metoo indeed.

Yes this isn't kindergarten. It's a shopping channel forum where people can post what they want. Mods decide what's allowed and what's not. Who cares if an MM post pops up? If you're so offended by it just ignore it and move on.

@KKJ it is kindergarten 101, for those of you who never learned about butting in on subject matter not wanted on this thread. Which I might add, was nice and peaceful before you and your gang came in to get thread deleted.

your obsession is beyond serious. Truely, get a real life beyond this "shopping channel"then. if you concider us trying to rise above the QVC-anon fodder. You and the gang need to release some hate and anger somewhere else. You and the others are highjacking the thread. I also admit to being mean, and breaking rules as well right now. But I am up to my ham-hocks in this driveling doo-doo about a couple no one wants to hear about. On this thread anyway. This isn't the Enquirer . Maybe I should rephrase that. Lol

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan

shoekitty · ‎03-10-2010

@lgfan wrote:
@tansy wrote:

@manny2 wrote:
@KKJ wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@tansy wrote:
The Queen and Fergie are connected to Andrew.

We have oodles and oodles of MM posts and very few about Andrew,

The poster said that this thread was about the trafficking victims and not about anyone else.

"This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse."
I just smh at some posters who scold others regarding what they think should only be posted on a thread. Again, this is a shopping channel forum and people will post various things. But yeah, we don't care at all about victims. Good grief. You know, I'm sure there are a thousand forums where ONLY child sex trafficking is discussed all day long and you wouldn't be annoyed by a random post about something else. But let's keep scolding others who don't post what you deem acceptable.
Threads broaden. That’s how discussion works. You can’t measure someone’s compassion by what topic they shift to next. You can care about trafficking victims and comment on jam.

Just another day on the boards @KKJ

Okay. Start a H&M thread and I will broaden it for you. I am sure you have seen posters told to start their own thread if they mention good old Andy. @manny2

It is difficult to start an H and M thread because they are usually poofed because posters complain to the mods.

@lgfan and that's what will happen here. Is that the plan? Do what I see others do. Go start a thread after 8pm EST with a subject matter that's easy to twist. Go at it til it shuts down morning. . That's what I see being done. Just sayin'.

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan

lgfan · ‎10-19-2012

@shoekitty wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@tansy wrote:

@manny2 wrote:
@KKJ wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@tansy wrote:
The Queen and Fergie are connected to Andrew.

We have oodles and oodles of MM posts and very few about Andrew,

The poster said that this thread was about the trafficking victims and not about anyone else.

"This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse."
I just smh at some posters who scold others regarding what they think should only be posted on a thread. Again, this is a shopping channel forum and people will post various things. But yeah, we don't care at all about victims. Good grief. You know, I'm sure there are a thousand forums where ONLY child sex trafficking is discussed all day long and you wouldn't be annoyed by a random post about something else. But let's keep scolding others who don't post what you deem acceptable.
Threads broaden. That’s how discussion works. You can’t measure someone’s compassion by what topic they shift to next. You can care about trafficking victims and comment on jam.

Just another day on the boards @KKJ

Okay. Start a H&M thread and I will broaden it for you. I am sure you have seen posters told to start their own thread if they mention good old Andy. @manny2

It is difficult to start an H and M thread because they are usually poofed because posters complain to the mods.
@lgfan and that's what will happen here. Is that the plan? Do what I see others do. Go start a thread after 8pm EST with a subject matter that's easy to twist. Go at it til it shuts down morning. . That's what I see being done. Just sayin'.

No thread is worth working yourself into a lather. It is not that important. I am amazed at the histrionics displayed regarding H and M threads. Maybe you should give it a rest and move on to other threads that aren't so stressful for you.

KKJ · ‎03-11-2010

@shoekitty wrote:
@KKJ wrote:
@Cakers3 wrote:
This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse.

Not about wickless candles and bad tasting jam.

It shows how much some really give a flying fig about victims.
It doesn't MATTER who started it. This isn't kindergarten.
The whole MM obsession matters more???

Every day I learn just who cares about victims around here.

#metoo indeed.

Yes this isn't kindergarten. It's a shopping channel forum where people can post what they want. Mods decide what's allowed and what's not. Who cares if an MM post pops up? If you're so offended by it just ignore it and move on.
@KKJ it is kindergarten 101, for those of you who never learned about budding in on subject matter not wanted on this thread. Which I might out was nice and peaceful before you and your gang came in to get thread deleted.
your obsession is beyond serious. Truely, get a real life beyond this "shopping channel"then. if you concider us trying to rise above the QVC-anon fodder. You and the gang need to release some hate and anger somewhere else. You and the others are high jacking the thread. I also admit to being mean, and breaking rules as well right now. But I am up to my ham hocks in this driveling doo-doo about a couple no one wants to hear about. On this thread anyway. This isn't the Enquirer . Maybe I should rephrase that. Lol

"You and your gang"? Wow! I agree with @lgfan, you take this way too seriously. "Hijacking a thread" LOL How dramatic. It's a shopping mb for pete's sake. And I've seen pretty much every thread (those that last) go off-topic at some point and who cares? Is it really worth getting so worked up over? I don't think it's me who needs to get a life. I agree with @lgfan that perhaps a less stressful forum would suit you better, whatever that may be.

Tinkrbl44 · ‎08-23-2010

Well, one way the conversation could be broadened is to discuss what Sarah and the Corgis will be doing.

Do the Corgis have passports? lol

I thought both of her daughters were married to wealthy men, so they must have a vacation home somewhere that she could settle into, at least until things get sorted out.

shoekitty · ‎03-10-2010

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

Well, one way the conversation could be broadened is to discuss what Sarah and the Corgis will be doing.

Do the Corgis have passports? loll

I thought both of her daughters were married to wealthy men, so they must have a vacation home somewhere that she could settle into, at least until things get sorted out.

@ I don't remember where I read it, but it was pretty reliable source. It started that the Queen actually had a soft spot in her heart for Sarah Main,y I thinkthink Fergiess passion for dogs and horses. And we all know how the Queen felt about that! I think no matter what one would think about Fergie, I think sheshe would take care of dogs best. I sure can't see Andrew doing it. Camille and Charles have Jack Russell's I think. We will see

i think Fergies daughters would see she was okay. Fergie is bad, at managing money. She blew though millions in just a couple years. Anyway, I don't know what she would do for pocket money,loll but I'm sure she could apply for the pensioners trust, like the regular people. I don't know if she old enough, but broke enough maybe.

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan

Linmo · ‎12-16-2013

Sarah and the corgis will be more than fine. Several have posted that Beatrice and Eugenie's husbands are both rich so she will be supported. Beatrice and Eugenie both earn a significant salary on their own and could help Sarah if she needed it.

beckyb1012 · ‎03-09-2010

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

Well, one way the conversation could be broadened is to discuss what Sarah and the Corgis will be doing.

Do the Corgis have passports? lol

I thought both of her daughters were married to wealthy men, so they must have a vacation home somewhere that she could settle into, at least until things get sorted out.

Supposedly to one of the British media outlets I watch the Corgis will be going home to the King and Queen to live out their days. They will not be staying with Fergie per what I heard last night.

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."