Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,825
Registered: ‎10-19-2012

@manny2 wrote:

@lgfan wrote:

@KKJ wrote:

Speaking of MM, saw a video of a guy who bought her "As Ever" stuff.  He opened the box to find the very expensive candle he ordered totally without a wick!  So much for her attention to detail. Then he opened the jar of jam he got and tried it. He spit it back out and said it tasted like cr*p. He then said  "Can I get my money back?"

LOLOL


 

 

I wonder if her products have a thirty day return policy like QVC.  I am also wondering why she isn't peddling her products on QVC.  I can only imagine how much fun it would be to see the duchess paired up with Shawn and Mally.


She would love the antics with Shawn and Mally, anything with a spotlight. Remember her on Ellen, crawling around doing pranks. If she is center stage, she is in.


 

 

She can also wear her tiara and teach the hosts how to do the royal wave.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,451
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@KKJ wrote:

Speaking of MM, saw a video of a guy who bought her "As Ever" stuff.  He opened the box to find the very expensive candle he ordered totally without a wick!  So much for her attention to detail. Then he opened the jar of jam he got and tried it. He spit it back out and said it tasted like cr*p. He then said  "Can I get my money back?"

LOLOL


I take anything like this with several grains of salt.  No one knows if it's true or just someone tryng to sling mud because of a personal agenda - dislike of the person or just wanting that "15 minutes of fame".  As to the jam, taste is very subjective, as we all know.

 

If I received products like that, I would contact the vendor to resolve the issue.  Not make an online video.  Only if the vendor didn't act in good faith, would I take it further - and I still wouldn't make an LOLOL video.

 

(He should direct his "can I get my money back" question directly to the vendor.  He just wants the attention.)

"" A little learning is a dangerous thing."-Alexander Pope
Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,753
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

MM is nowhere in the realm of evil like Andrew.

 

I wish we would evict our own personal Andrew.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,352
Registered: ‎05-01-2010

I heard Andrew Lownie who wrote Entitled:the fall of the house of York interviewed. He stated that Epstein attempted to hire a British ex- military marksman to assassinate Prince Andrew and Sarah because Epstein was afraid they would reveal his secrets. He also said that Epstein was murdered by another inmate and that the autopsy did not confirm suicide. I don't know if Mr. Lownie is considered a valid source.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,306
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

The vote is in with only one person voting no to not release the files.

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."
Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,753
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

 


@chessylady wrote:

I heard Andrew Lownie who wrote Entitled:the fall of the house of York interviewed. He stated that Epstein attempted to hire a British ex- military marksman to assassinate Prince Andrew and Sarah because Epstein was afraid they would reveal his secrets. He also said that Epstein was murdered by another inmate and that the autopsy did not confirm suicide. I don't know if Mr. Lownie is considered a valid source.


I don't know that man's reputation but I lean towards Epstein not being a suicide at this point. @chessylady 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,273
Registered: ‎01-04-2014

I always figured MI6 was in town that day.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,753
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

 


@chessylady wrote:

I heard Andrew Lownie who wrote Entitled:the fall of the house of York interviewed. He stated that Epstein attempted to hire a British ex- military marksman to assassinate Prince Andrew and Sarah because Epstein was afraid they would reveal his secrets. He also said that Epstein was murdered by another inmate and that the autopsy did not confirm suicide. I don't know if Mr. Lownie is considered a valid source.


It sounds like Lonnie is reputable, @chessylady đź¤·â€Ťâ™€ď¸Ź

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,295
Registered: ‎05-09-2010

@shoekitty wrote:

@Mz iMac wrote:

@Tinkrbl44  "I don't care WHAT your title is.  If you have children, it's YOUR job to care for them.   "

Spoken like a woman who I assume was born in a county whose monarchy was booted out sometime around the 1780s. Smiley Wink

 

Within the WORLDWIDE monarchy still in existence, heirs & spares are rarely if ever raised by either parents.  They are raised by the nannies & "the help."  The heirs are separated from their siblings when they reach a certain age in regards to schooling & the "how to run a country" & "how to interact w/their subjects" lessons.

 

And don't forget, "Elizabeth" did not become an heir until the age of 10.  That is when her schooling changed as she was in effect 10 years behind in her "how to act & think as a queen" lessons.

 

 

 


@Mz iMac so true!!!  I think even Elizabeth regretted she didn't get a normal education later in life. I mean, can you believe as a woman, and heir to the throne they didn't really teach her math, history and such as we learn it. Only what she would need to rule. I think she realized the deficiency in her education as Queen and when conversing with others in her business as Queen . They portrayed a little bit about that aspect of her life in The Queen.  I had read earlier about that in a biography about her. She didn't know how stock market worked, how economy worked, certain historical and geographical facts.   


@shoekitty That is a bit disturbing that her education did not include those topics.

Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else. Margaret Mead
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,825
Registered: ‎10-19-2012

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@Puppy Lips wrote:

@shoekitty wrote:

@Mz iMac wrote:

@Tinkrbl44  "I don't care WHAT your title is.  If you have children, it's YOUR job to care for them.   "

Spoken like a woman who I assume was born in a county whose monarchy was booted out sometime around the 1780s. Smiley Wink

 

Within the WORLDWIDE monarchy still in existence, heirs & spares are rarely if ever raised by either parents.  They are raised by the nannies & "the help."  The heirs are separated from their siblings when they reach a certain age in regards to schooling & the "how to run a country" & "how to interact w/their subjects" lessons.

 

And don't forget, "Elizabeth" did not become an heir until the age of 10.  That is when her schooling changed as she was in effect 10 years behind in her "how to act & think as a queen" lessons.

 

 

 


@Mz iMac so true!!!  I think even Elizabeth regretted she didn't get a normal education later in life. I mean, can you believe as a woman, and heir to the throne they didn't really teach her math, history and such as we learn it. Only what she would need to rule. I think she realized the deficiency in her education as Queen and when conversing with others in her business as Queen . They portrayed a little bit about that aspect of her life in The Queen.  I had read earlier about that in a biography about her. She didn't know how stock market worked, how economy worked, certain historical and geographical facts.   


@shoekitty That is a bit disturbing that her education did not include those topics.


 

 

During that era many women weren't educated in the list that is mentioned.  The idea was why educate women since they will get married and raise children.  My grandmother didn't receive an education beyond the sixth grade because that was the attitude during that time