Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,273
Registered: ‎06-19-2010

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year


@Venezia wrote:

@Mmsfoxxie wrote:

If I were one of the other women named on this list, I'd ask that my name be taken off.  Not because I have anything against a transgender but because Jenner has not done anything to be considered a woman, as far as I know.  He's had no surgeries to change his anatomy other than, I think, his adam's apple made smaller and put on a ton of make-up.

 

He still seems to like women, too which means he probably thinks like a man.  It's as if he's putting on a show for everybody.  Right now, he's talking the talk but not walking the walk.


And you would know what's in her mind and heart, right?


Actually, Bruce has said he likes women.  I never watched his show but it was in the news that he was dating one of the lady's on the show.  So if he's a female, maybe that makes him a lesbian?  To me, it looks like a cross dresser.

“You can’t wait until life isn’t hard anymore to be happy”. (By Nightbirde, singer of the song, It’s Ok)
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,287
Registered: ‎01-24-2013

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year

I thought this battle had been fought already with an earlier thread on the same topic ?

In fact, I see many of the same participants on that deleted thread posting the same remarks.
Valued Contributor
Posts: 937
Registered: ‎08-26-2013

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year

I wrote Glamour magazine off a long time ago.  Looks like I made the correct decision!

Bruce is Bruce.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,229
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year


@Lila Belle wrote:
I thought this battle had been fought already with an earlier thread on the same topic ?

In fact, I see many of the same participants on that deleted thread posting the same remarks.

 

 

 

@Lila Belle

the OTHER thread is still there, just down a few pages.

yes, it has been "fought" already......that is one of the reasons why i just copied and pasted my comments and notes from that other thread. Smiley Wink

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,517
Registered: ‎09-18-2014

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year


@physicsnut wrote:

I wrote Glamour magazine off a long time ago.  Looks like I made the correct decision!

Bruce is Bruce.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't think they care that you no longer read.  The average age of the Glamour reader is 30 years old.  Far younger than the demographic in this forum.  Like it or not, they gear the Woman of the Year to their primary readership.  Young women.  Young women who have very different ideas about what or who is newsworthy than the over 50 demographic here.

~Enough is enough~
Valued Contributor
Posts: 947
Registered: ‎10-24-2015

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year


@June222 wrote:

Bruce tends to dress rather skanky. I guess it is his idea of what women should look like.....he is 65 or so.....he needs to start dressing the part.


Just like KIM does.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,386
Registered: ‎07-29-2014

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year


@muttmom wrote:

Caitlyn Jenner Stuns in Royal Blue Moschino Gown at the 2015 Women of the Year Awards

 

 


Classy,fab, and classic.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,305
Registered: ‎06-15-2015

Re: One of Glamour Magazine's Women of the Year

[ Edited ]

@feline groovy wrote:

@muttmom wrote:

Caitlyn Jenner Stuns in Royal Blue Moschino Gown at the 2015 Women of the Year Awards

 

 


Classy,fab, and classic.


 

Sad.....big hands....

QVC Customer Care
Posts: 1,681
Registered: ‎06-14-2015

Re: Glamour Magazine Women of the Year

Honored Contributor
Posts: 35,131
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Glamour Magazine Women of the Year


@Winkk wrote:

Are you kidding me? 


And people seem surprised that the Donald might be the leader?  Good grief why not?  Makes more sense than this?