Notorious RBG is back to work ! - Page 9

Greeneyedlady21 · ‎01-06-2015

It's all about things other than age, it's perfectly obvious.

"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

sunshine45 · ‎03-09-2010

@Greeneyedlady21 wrote:
It's all about things other than age, it's perfectly obvious.

LOL you know that, i know that, but not "everyone" knows that.

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein

Greeneyedlady21 · ‎01-06-2015

That's why no one will say that Justice Scalia should have retired.

"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Rockycoast · ‎03-02-2016

@Ms tyrion2 wrote:
@RetRN wrote:
She is soon to be 86. I would like to see someone much younger replace her on the bench. I would like to think that there are some smart young lawyers out there who could fill her shoes. However, clearly she is going nowhere. We are all entitled to our opinions.

How could a smart young lawyer possibly fill a Supreme Court Justice's shoes?

They could not. They would not have the smarts nor even come close to the experience that The Notorious RBG has. 'nuff said.

Ms tyrion2 · ‎05-08-2017

@RetRN wrote:
@Ms tyrion2 wrote:
@RetRN wrote:
She is soon to be 86. I would like to see someone much younger replace her on the bench. I would like to think that there are some smart young lawyers out there who could fill her shoes. However, clearly she is going nowhere. We are all entitled to our opinions.

How could a smart young lawyer possibly fill a Supreme Court Justice's shoes?
Quite easily, do you not think there are smart young people in the world? Or do you think that only elderly people can handle high level postions? I
do not discriminate when it comes to age.

Your point is ridiculous.

A smart young lawyer is not a judge.

It's not ageist at all. It is a matter of experience and ability. A smart, young lawyer is lacking in the experience as a judge that would qualify him/her for the position.

Did you forget about this step?

RetRN · ‎10-01-2013

I hope she can stay awake.

Ms tyrion2 · ‎05-08-2017

@RetRN wrote:
I hope she can stay awake.

Such hate you carry for those who have different values than you. It fairly flows out of these pages on a daily basis.

What a way to live.

Snoopp · ‎02-02-2015

@RetRN wrote:
I hope she can stay awake.

I was thinking about the reports of her falling asleep. When you become impaired enough to not do your best on the job, perhaps time to go.

Cakers3 · ‎06-17-2015

We have a SC with dissenting opinions. As it should be.

I find it odd that those who disagree with RBG are deemed as haters but those who disagree with opposing justices are deemed the true learned people of the Constitution.

RBG is to be respected for her contributions to the highest court in our land; whether one agrees with her or not is not the issue.

Since the justices debate and concur and dissent is the point; we can all do the same without accusing others of being ignorant, a hater, or any other assorted slams.

I may not like some of the decisions and I may agree with others; it doesn't make me deserving of my picture hanging in the court nor does it make me a "hater".

Debate the issues, not the label.

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh