Community Chat

[humpty dumpty]

I was at the supermarket today and saw the cover of InTouch at the checkout ... headline was "$200 million divorce settlement" with a picture of George and his wife ... caption said something like "after only four months of marriage" and that there were arguments about having children, the women that were in his life pre-marriage, and her diva-like ways ...

True? ... or just stirring the pot? ...

[Love my grandkids]

Just more grist for the gossip mill. I wouldn't waste my time reading that.

[humpty dumpty]

I thought the same thing ... I never buy the ""rags"" ... but could not help but notice while checking out ...

[MickD]

Won't believe it until a divorce has been filed...

[Deb1010again]

In Touch is getting to be as bad as the Enquirer and Star, etc... They got in trouble for their cover of Bruce Jenner as a woman -- basically photoshopped his face onto a woman's headshot. I guess further in the article it said they said the cover was an artist's rendition of what he'd look like as a woman. The actual woman's headshot they used turned out to be an actress and she came forward and was ticked.

Anywho, InTouch is a garbage magazine and I wouldn't believe ANYTHING they report.

[Puzzle Piece]

I started a thread on this and it was deleted. Same news was reported around two weeks ago. If they find they are not suited for one another, it would be best to end the marriage.

[brewhaha]

Where there's smoke there's arsonists.

[OC FRESH]

[Ms X]

Time will tell. I'm not a fan of Clooney and his "gal pal," but I wouldn't wish that on anyone, even these two hypocrites.

[Buck-i-Nana]

On 1/31/2015 Ms X said:

Time will tell. I'm not a fan of Clooney and his "gal pal," but I wouldn't wish that on anyone, even these two hypocrites.

Exactly what are they hypocritical about?