Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,792
Registered: ‎08-29-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@Lila Belle wrote:
Post #8 spoke to my heart ! ; )

Oh, you bleed blue, huh?  Woman Wink

Strive for respect instead of attention. It lasts longer.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,684
Registered: ‎05-30-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted

I think the whole hearting, unhearting thing is one of the funniest things I've ever read about.   

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,792
Registered: ‎08-29-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted

@brownponytail80 wrote:

Ya'll really keep track of how many hearts you've received?  Alrighty.



There's no reference here about keeping track of anything, but  I certainly cannot speak for anyone but myself.  As I said earlier, I read a thread about someone's rank being promoted.  The conversation went into the hearts that are given out.  I was curious about it, so I checked my own number.  I did look again later, and noticed the number had gone down.  Again, because I am not 'up' on these things, I originated this post to inquire about it.  

 

Alrighty?

Strive for respect instead of attention. It lasts longer.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,792
Registered: ‎08-29-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@smokymtngal wrote:

I think the whole hearting, unhearting thing is one of the funniest things I've ever read about.   


Yet you've given them to 45 people, and some more than once.   

Strive for respect instead of attention. It lasts longer.
Super Contributor
Posts: 462
Registered: ‎05-30-2015

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@IamMrsG wrote:

@smokymtngal wrote:

I think the whole hearting, unhearting thing is one of the funniest things I've ever read about.   


Yet you've given them to 45 people, and some more than once.   


You can't check out other people's hearts.  Someone here said that was a form of stalking.

I teach - what's your superpower?
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,792
Registered: ‎08-29-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@brownponytail80 wrote:

@IamMrsG wrote:

@smokymtngal wrote:

I think the whole hearting, unhearting thing is one of the funniest things I've ever read about.   


Yet you've given them to 45 people, and some more than once.   


You can't check out other people's hearts.  Someone here said that was a form of stalking.


"Someone here" has said a lot of things.  Please supply a reference to it in the Community Standards.  Each of our nicknames is a public link to our profile.  

Strive for respect instead of attention. It lasts longer.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,603
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

Re: Might have been un-hearted

Why would anyone check out someone else's hearts?  Who gives a flying fig?  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,136
Registered: ‎06-03-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@tansy wrote:

Why would anyone check out someone else's hearts?  Who gives a flying fig?  


I couldn't agree with you more..............but actually, you'd be quite surprised at who would check out someone's  hearts...............................raven

We're not in Kansas anymore ToTo
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,136
Registered: ‎06-03-2010

Re: Might have been un-hearted


@IamMrsG wrote:

@smokymtngal wrote:

I think the whole hearting, unhearting thing is one of the funniest things I've ever read about.   


Yet you've given them to 45 people, and some more than once.   


If someone found somthing funny or fun...........I can see where they might join in on it..........especially if it made them laugh...........everyone could use a little more laughter in their day..........................................raven

We're not in Kansas anymore ToTo
Super Contributor
Posts: 316
Registered: ‎04-07-2015

Re: Might have been un-hearted

I really don't understand what the problem is - with the hearts, or lack of them, - what does it  really mean ? Robot Indifferent Oh, and these emoticons are truly dreadful.