Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
07-31-2015 06:41 PM
If Mia found an address, anyone could find the same address. Good for her. The dentist is scum. Trophy hunting is WRONG. Woody was not charged. There are 2 sides to every story. James Woods IS suing someone who posted derogatory remarks so "watch what you post".
07-31-2015 06:42 PM
She may be both, a caring person AND a bit unstable. But she did nothing wrong in this case. It's all a matter of public record. She did a GOOD thing.
07-31-2015 06:45 PM
Evidently the reports that it ever was a
home address were wrong and nobody
claimimg it has a screen shot of anything
except the business address.
Either way like I said before in my earlier
post
the lynch
mob mentality is wrong imho.
07-31-2015 06:57 PM
I know their home address.
I won't post it here but I know it.
One can find out anything about anyone in today's world. I think Mia's problem was simply in violating Twitter's Terms of Service.
I mean, one can argue which address she posted or if its "nice" to post any such address (as it seems to encourage people to go to its front door...as to "do something").
But really anyone could get their hands on the same information - even more than she posted or knew, quite frankly.
07-31-2015 06:58 PM
@surfk wrote:I know their home address.
I won't post it here but I know it.
One can find out anything about anyone in today's world. I think Mia's problem was simply in violating Twitter's Terms of Service.
I mean, one can argue which address she posted or if its "nice" to post any such address (as it seems to encourage people to go to its front door...as to "do something").
But really anyone could get their hands on the same information - even more than she posted or knew, quite frankly.
actually, she didn't even do that
"A Twitter spokesman said the company does not comment on individual accounts for privacy and security reasons. He directed The Associated Press to official Twitter rules and policies that allow wiggle room on disciplinary action when information was previously posted or displayed elsewhere on the Internet prior to being put on Twitter."
07-31-2015 07:05 PM
@SydneyH wrote:This unstable woman should be charged with obstruction, what she did was wrong........
____________________________________________________________________
Obstruction of what?
Obstuction of justice is a legal term and a chargeable offense, but it doesn't seem to apply here. Posting a business address that is easily available to everyone who has a computer is not obstructing justice.
His business address was identified before she even posted her Tweet.
07-31-2015 07:07 PM
Actually to win a libel or defamation case one has to prove malicious intent....I just read info about James Woods...he may as well drop his suit even though the statement made about him was made as fact, IDK how he would be able to prove malicious intent. He should probably just move on.
07-31-2015 07:09 PM
@ritasNo1Fan wrote:If Mia found an address, anyone could find the same address. Good for her. The dentist is scum. Trophy hunting is WRONG. Woody was not charged. There are 2 sides to every story. James Woods IS suing someone who posted derogatory remarks so "watch what you post".
There is also the pesky matter of Dylan Farrow's open letter, published in the NYT.......
07-31-2015 07:13 PM
YorkieonmyPillow's post: Actually to win a libel or defamation case one has to prove malicious intent....I just read info about James Woods...he may as well drop his suit even though the statement made about him was made as fact, IDK how he would be able to prove malicious intent. He should probably just move on.
The elements of the crime of defamation varies from state to state, so I don't think making a blanket statement about it is accurate. Not to mention that, by court decision, there are two standards used for defamation, with a different one (harder to prove) for famous people than for others.
07-31-2015 07:17 PM - edited 07-31-2015 07:18 PM
@biancardi wrote:
@surfk wrote:I know their home address.
I won't post it here but I know it.
One can find out anything about anyone in today's world. I think Mia's problem was simply in violating Twitter's Terms of Service.
I mean, one can argue which address she posted or if its "nice" to post any such address (as it seems to encourage people to go to its front door...as to "do something").
But really anyone could get their hands on the same information - even more than she posted or knew, quite frankly.
actually, she didn't even do that
"A Twitter spokesman said the company does not comment on individual accounts for privacy and security reasons. He directed The Associated Press to official Twitter rules and policies that allow wiggle room on disciplinary action when information was previously posted or displayed elsewhere on the Internet prior to being put on Twitter."
All the better for Mia. I mean, these pieces of information (including whatever she posted) are available on the net and elsewhere to anyone LOOKING. Its not as though Mia knew the info before Interpol did or anything. lol
I think that Mia Farrow is a very compassionate, sensitive - perhaps overly sensitive (debatably,) social activist sort of a person. I think she feels we are indeed the guardians of "the beasts and the children" (as the story and the song go).
And a guardian who just sit there on their fat a$) is not acting responsibly.
Palmer knows he is one of the most notorious figures in the world today. Surely he knows that patients, friends, neighbors and associates all know where he lives. Its not a big leap to know such info will circulate fast.
I don't think its necessarily attractive to post a HOME address since what is the point? I mean, people who would show up would all be arrested quicker than he will be for his deadly deed.
But to repost his dental business address? That's common info and public info. And quite frankly its he who put it out there in all his vanity advertisements long before he murdered hunted Cecil.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788