Jeffrey Epstein found dead - Page 5

Venezia · ‎03-09-2010

@Ketra wrote:
So sadddddd☹️ I’m glad my tax dollars aren’t going to pay for his trial or to feed him. I just hope they prosecute all his rich, influential friends who did the same thing. Though it wouldn’t surprise me at all if we heard no more about it. Prince Andrew.....etc..

@Ketra - I think naming anyone else without any facts to back up that allegation is wrong. Rumors and gossip aren't facts and can be very damaging and hurtful to someone who is innocent until and unless proven guilty.

It's enough that Epstein was jailed and facing prosecution, based on the findings. We don't need to bring anyone else into it, unless the courts decide there is evidence with which to proceed.

As for Epstein - a coward.

"" A little learning is a dangerous thing."-Alexander Pope

just bee · ‎03-10-2010

Not to worry. Surely, "journalists" will race to find the truth here and there will be a thorough investigation.

Oh, wait. That's not going to happen...

~My philosophy: Dogs are God's most perfect creatures. Angels, here on Earth, who teach us to be better human beings.~

esmerelda · ‎03-10-2010

@ILTH wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
@Keybra wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
A. He was in jail, not at the gym.

B. I see there’s more interest in revenge than justice.
Their should be. If it were your daughter , you would want revenge.
@Keybra No. His being dead would be enough. I think those wishing for a trial wanted to hear all the dirty, lurid details.
I want a trial. I'm not interested in lurid details. I want names. I want justice.

Not all of us are interested in anything else. Are you projecting?

@ILTH No. I don’t need a trial. There are lots of books if you want to read about it I’m sure. And there will be names. And it will be frustrating. Because the names will be people who operate in circles that will allow them to go pretty much untouched.

*********************
Keepin' it real.

ILTH · ‎05-18-2015

@esmerelda wrote:
@ILTH wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
@Keybra wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
A. He was in jail, not at the gym.

B. I see there’s more interest in revenge than justice.
Their should be. If it were your daughter , you would want revenge.
@Keybra No. His being dead would be enough. I think those wishing for a trial wanted to hear all the dirty, lurid details.
I want a trial. I'm not interested in lurid details. I want names. I want justice.

Not all of us are interested in anything else. Are you projecting?
@ILTH No. I don’t need a trial. There are lots of books if you want to read about it I’m sure. And there will be names. And it will be frustrating. Because the names will be people who operate in circles that will allow them to go pretty much untouched.

Do you really not understand that it's about prosecuting everyone (including Epstein) who participated and not about reading a book and details?

proudlyfromNJ · ‎05-01-2010

@just bee wrote:
Not to worry. Surely, "journalists" will race to find the truth here and there will be a thorough investigation.

Oh, wait. That's not going to happen...

@just bee. There are names on both sides. Don’t kid yourself.

esmerelda · ‎03-10-2010

@ILTH I mentioned books for those who are disappointed there will not be a trial and still want details.

*********************
Keepin' it real.

esmerelda · ‎03-10-2010

@ILTH wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
@ILTH wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
@Keybra wrote:
@esmerelda wrote:
A. He was in jail, not at the gym.

B. I see there’s more interest in revenge than justice.
Their should be. If it were your daughter , you would want revenge.
@Keybra No. His being dead would be enough. I think those wishing for a trial wanted to hear all the dirty, lurid details.
I want a trial. I'm not interested in lurid details. I want names. I want justice.

Not all of us are interested in anything else. Are you projecting?
@ILTH No. I don’t need a trial. There are lots of books if you want to read about it I’m sure. And there will be names. And it will be frustrating. Because the names will be people who operate in circles that will allow them to go pretty much untouched.
Do you really not understand that it's about prosecuting everyone (including Epstein) who participated and not about reading a book and details?

@ILTH See…you sound frustrated already. Do you really think the rich and famous will be prosecuted? Some rich and famous have committed crimes (not connected to this), everybody including law-enforcement knows about them, and they will never be prosecuted because of who they are. It will be the same here.

*********************
Keepin' it real.

QVCkitty1 · ‎05-23-2015

@proudlyfromNJ wrote:
@just bee wrote:
Not to worry. Surely, "journalists" will race to find the truth here and there will be a thorough investigation.

Oh, wait. That's not going to happen...
@just bee. There are names on both sides. Don’t kid yourself.

Why does it always come down to sides, is this what we’ve come to ??

" You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts."
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

just bee · ‎03-10-2010

@QVCkitty1 wrote:

@proudlyfromNJ wrote:
@just bee wrote:
Not to worry. Surely, "journalists" will race to find the truth here and there will be a thorough investigation.

Oh, wait. That's not going to happen...
@just bee. There are names on both sides. Don’t kid yourself.
Why does it always come down to sides, is this what we’ve come to ??