The witness, Neal Peskind, is the SVP for the company which reps the hotel group owning this franchised Marriott. He testified in the trial the other day.
He was out to dinner with his wife and others on Tuesday night, and they were discussing the trial (which is not illegal unless there is a gag order, which there is not in this case).
He was overheard by the staff, allegedly stating that this trial was costing him millions and he was going to view the video as much as he wanted. The staff asked him to stop.
This is not quite the story he is telling, of course. He says that his dinner companions were watching the video, and he asked them to stop. He then claims that they did not stop "as fast as he would have liked".
Either way, bad taste, and goes to prove Erin's point of continuing problems stemming from the recording being made and posted.
Culpability of the franchise partners is one of the main questions in this; is this a "but for the Marriott's..." or is this just the already convicted video taker?
The jury will decide.
My personal opinion is that the Marriott is partially responsible, but their negligence.
If you are interested in reading a good article about the happenings with this witness in the restaurant, follow this link:
http://www.wsmv.com/story/31366114/attorney-for-marriott-ownership-group-says-andrews-video-was-play...
Interesting point to note: Hulk Hogan is currently in court suing Gawker for $100 million for a sex tape (101 second clip, of which he is seen for 9 seconds) being posted in their site.
Information on that here:
http://www.wildabouttrial.com/one_off/possible-jurors-called-for-trial-between-hulk-hogan-gawker/