Re: Harry and Lilibet

tends2dogs · ‎05-08-2010

I don't follow any of the royal stuff, but I wanted to see this picture. I think it is a great picture of a dad, who loves his daughter in a moment of affection. You don't need to see faces. The picture says it all.

BTW the boat looks like a pontoon.

Fear not Brothers and Sisters! I have read THE BOOK..........we win!!!

KKJ · ‎03-11-2010

@chrystaltree wrote:

Looked like they were on a lounge chair to me. But if it was on a boat, it was staged. None the less. I don't think the back of someone's head is a picture. And that's all they ever show. Very odd people.

It's all for attention and a big tease for them. On one hand they claim to want privacy for their kids, and then show pics of only the backs of their heads, like they're saying "ha ha! this is all you get!" And I believe if the price was right, MM would have their faces plastered on every mag cover there is. She's the "I can't believe I'm not getting paid for this!" girl.

beckyb1012 · ‎03-09-2010

This thread as nothing to do with showing or not showing the child's face but the fact she is out in a boat without a life jacket.

Some are trying to deflect the wrong that Harry is doing.

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

William and Kate allow their children to be photographed. What’s the problem with that?

If it benefits Meghan, she will do it too. Right now, she just dangles their image to get the traffic over to whatever she is selling.

Bri369 · ‎11-03-2018

They may have taken off her life jacket for the photo. Who really knows what happened...

kitcat51 · ‎09-15-2016

I don't care who the parents are, children should always wear a life jacket on a boat.

Still Raining · ‎03-30-2014

Really transparent ploy for publicity for her series. Trot out the husband and the back of a kid's head. So posed.

faeriemoon · ‎03-14-2010

@Bri369 wrote:
They may have taken off her life jacket for the photo. Who really knows what happened...

@Bri369 My feeling also because it looks like there is a life jacket clip on the side of her body, as if she were holding one. As a boater I will add she should have been wearing it; picture or no picture.

~What a terrible era in which idiots govern the blind.~ William Shakespeare

Rockycoast · ‎03-02-2016

Beautiful photo of a loving dad and his daughter. Good for them for not showing their kids faces. No reason to.

Tinkrbl44 · ‎08-23-2010

@manny2 wrote:
William and Kate allow their children to be photographed. What’s the problem with that?

If it benefits Meghan, she will do it too. Right now, she just dangles their image to get the traffic over to whatever she is selling.

@manny2

Oh, please ..... Just wait until Kate & Will's kids faces end up on kiddie p orn sites. There are a LOT of sick people out there, and the CA laws have changed to protect both parents and kids likenesses. They are smart to not show their faces.