Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,758
Registered: ‎01-18-2012

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

@50Mickey  No not living independently at all while Duchy of Cornwall still financing them.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,137
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

Yep, creeping up on his "middle years" and Daddy is still paying his bills.

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,318
Registered: ‎12-21-2010

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

@50Mickey 

do take bad the word you just said.

 

Giorgia ( Lady Colin Campbell) is  a friend of mine and you have insulted me as well for using that word.

Do occupy with your own affairs solely and do stop desrespect my friend.

 

I simply do not beleive what I have read by you saying my friend that word, be quiete @50Mickey 

The Supreme Happiness Of Life Consists In The Conviction That One Is Loved.
I come from the beautiful and sunny Athens Greece
Valued Contributor
Posts: 767
Registered: ‎06-04-2016

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements


@beckyb1012 wrote:

Yep, creeping up on his "middle years" and Daddy is still paying his bills.


---

 

I suspect that this "model" is used here in America as well.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

@SuhseK. You must have missed the photo op / publicity of H &M helping this week at a bakery staffed by formerly trafficked women and former female prisoners. Not done privately by any means.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,263
Registered: ‎12-16-2013

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements


@Pearlee wrote:
@SuhseK. You must have missed the photo op / publicity of H &M helping this week at a bakery staffed by formerly trafficked women and former female prisoners. Not done privately by any means.

@Pearlee It's entirely possible that the "photo op / publicity" that you mention was done to raise awareness for the organization that they were supporting, not for personal publicity.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,511
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements


@Dinaki wrote:

It is prohibited by law in the United Kingdom for any royal member to discuss politics/

It is considered uncosnttutional to vote also.

So miss Meghan better zip it up.

 

Lady Colin Campbell 

 

I also heard that she was wants to run as a president here in US (yeah right)


 

@Dinaki 

 

So .... you think if they offer an opinion on anything political, the British police are going to hunt them down and arrest them?  Yeah right.

 

And you supposedly "heard" she wants to run for president?  President of what?   Where did you "hear" that?

 

People keep forgetting that Harry is THE SPARE, as they call it.   The first born is always the most important and the rest are window dressing and ribbon cutters.  Even if he'd stayed in the goldfish bowl and waved at the crowds, he'd have little say on his own life.   

 

All the royals are accidents of birth, meaning they never had to qualify for anything.   Personally, I think it's time for the monarchy to be abolished.  They really aren't necessary.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 767
Registered: ‎06-04-2016

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

[ Edited ]

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

@Dinaki wrote:

It is prohibited by law in the United Kingdom for any royal member to discuss politics/

. . .

 

@Dinaki 

 

So .... you think if they offer an opinion on anything political, the British police are going to hunt them down and arrest them?  Yeah right.

 

And you supposedly "heard" she wants to run for president?  President of what?   Where did you "hear" that?

 

People keep forgetting that Harry is THE SPARE, as they call it.   The first born is always the most important and the rest are window dressing and ribbon cutters.  Even if he'd stayed in the goldfish bowl and waved at the crowds, he'd have little say on his own life.   

 

All the royals are accidents of birth, meaning they never had to qualify for anything.   Personally, I think it's time for the monarchy to be abolished.  They really aren't necessary.


---

 

While I agree with most everything stated directly above, I would like to hang on to the monarchy for a while longer.

 

After Charles, all bets are off.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,210
Registered: ‎03-23-2010

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

I can think of several times in my lifetime that members of the royal family have shown their political preferences--maybe not through specific words, but through their actions, so there was really no need for H & M to part ways with the royal family if they simply wanted to support politicians or their platforms.  By signing on to do future speaking engagements and posing at the bakery, it seems privacy was not what they were really after, either.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,308
Registered: ‎05-21-2010

Re: Harry & Meghan signed on for speaking engagements

 


@Dinaki wrote:

@50Mickey 

do take bad the word you just said.

 

Giorgia ( Lady Colin Campbell) is  a friend of mine and you have insulted me as well for using that word.

Do occupy with your own affairs solely and do stop desrespect my friend.

 

I simply do not beleive what I have read by you saying my friend that word, be quiete @50Mickey 


Sorry Dinaki, it dosn't work that way. You don't get to dictate what I or any other poster writes.  I stand by my description of the Lady and you may think what you want. Please notice that I did not tell you what to write. That's your right in this country.