Community Chat

[tansy]

Great name.  I wish them well.  No one owes the public pictures of their child.  Why would the public need to see the birth certificate?

[dulwich]

I understand that their patent for the Archewell charity also covers ‘merchandise and wellness’.  Be interesting to see their products as they now have to make a living.

[Pearlee]

@dulwich On Archie's birth certificate Me ghb han is referenced by her real name and her occupation is listed as Princess of United Kingdom.

[Pearlee]

Sorry my phone messed up Meghan's name.

[Drythe]

---

@dulwich wrote:

Quite interesting.  Baby been hidden for  a year now they appear to be ‘using’ his name to aid their marketing purposes.

---

@dulwich 

It does seem rather inconsistent with all the deeply held desire for privacy.

I don't generally think of charities being named after someone unless it is a memorial. (no ill wishes here)  But, I suppose this particular name was at their disposal.

[esmerelda]

---

@Pearlee wrote:
Sorry my phone messed up Meghan's name.

---

...which is Rachel. 

[Goldengate8361]

I will NEVER understand the negatively with which others project onto Harry and Meghan. I hope they make a TON of money....nothing wrong with that...while they also make a TON of money for charity....nothing wrong with that. I hope they make a TON of money by selling photos of their baby - if they want to -and they can do whatever they want with their money.

Think about it....There are some seriously BAD, narcissisitic, nasty public people. Harry and Meghan just aren't in that category - by anyone's standards.

I almost feel embarassed for the folks who bash them so badly because it makes them look so sad....and small.

[jonbon]

---

@Pearlee wrote:
@dulwichOn Archie's birth certificate Me ghb han is referenced by her real name and her occupation is listed as Princess of United Kingdom.

---

Makes sense that she would be referenced by her legal name. Kate is also listed as Princess on all three of her children’s birth certificates; seems that is how it is done. 

[Mersha]

---

@Goldengate8361 wrote:

I will NEVER understand the negatively with which others project onto Harry and Meghan. I hope they make a TON of money....nothing wrong with that...while they also make a TON of money for charity....nothing wrong with that. I hope they make a TON of money by selling photos of their baby - if they want to -and they can do whatever they want with their money.

Think about it....There are some seriously BAD, narcissisitic, nasty public people. Harry and Meghan just aren't in that category - by anyone's standards.

I almost feel embarassed for the folks who bash them so badly because it makes them look so sad....and small.

---

@Goldengate8361 Great points!  I have always asked the same questions.

It is like moths to a flame when a Meghan/Harry thread pops up, with all the same posters who bash consistently.

[esmerelda]

---

@dulwich wrote:

Quite interesting.  Baby been hidden for  a year now they appear to be ‘using’ his name to aid their marketing purposes.

---

She’s a user. And nobody is out of bounds.