Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,316
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

@gardenman 

The burn-in issue with OLED happens b/c they are so much brighter than backlit LEDs. Taking the brightness level down by 50% makes it watchable for me and it will also extend the life of the screen. OLED is way too bright for comfortable viewing at night especially. But I say say this much, when I have the thing turned up to normal brightness with the vivid color on it is spectacular. Combine that with their AI and it's mind-blowing.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,171
Registered: ‎01-14-2017

 

I like to watch movies, and was due for a new TV.  I was planning on buying a 48" because I have a small NYC apt. I went to the stores and realized how much the TV world has changed in just the last few years!  Just walking through the store, the big TVs looked really good to me!  So I went back to do some research.  The way TVs work now, large TVs are better for viewing even up close.  I was born in the 1960s and my mom was always telling me not to sit too close to the TV because it would ruin my eyes.  I was already nearsighted, which is why I liked to sit close.  TVs now are very different from those days, radiation is shielded and won't harm our vision, other than strain and fatigue which is easily remedied by resting our eyes.  We can watch as close as we want.

 

The biggest TV I could get for my space was 55" and I went all out with a new SONY OLED model for Christmas.  My research indicated OLED shows the truest colors and the new SONY model addresses issues with brightness.  Very happy with my purchase which is still underutilized!

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,171
Registered: ‎01-14-2017

@SilleeMee wrote:

@gardenman 

The burn-in issue with OLED happens b/c they are so much brighter than backlit LEDs. Taking the brightness level down by 50% makes it watchable for me and it will also extend the life of the screen. OLED is way too bright for comfortable viewing at night especially. But I say say this much, when I have the thing turned up to normal brightness with the vivid color on it is spectacular. Combine that with their AI and it's mind-blowing.


 

@SilleeMee @gardenman   My research said burn in is only a risk if you have the same static image on for hours a day, for many many days, which I guess some gamers do.  (I don't "game".  Maybe a card game on my macbook every once in a while.  No ghosting from that.)  As long as the images are varied, there is no burn in.  There may be "ghosting". from leaving a static image for a few hours at a time, but even that ghosting goes away if the TV is changed to varied content for a period of time.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 37,498
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I have very old Tv' s and with a Comcast box on them, my pix is so nice and clear enough for me. i will keep them until they die !!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,316
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

@NYCLatinaMe wrote:

@SilleeMee wrote:

@gardenman 

The burn-in issue with OLED happens b/c they are so much brighter than backlit LEDs. Taking the brightness level down by 50% makes it watchable for me and it will also extend the life of the screen. OLED is way too bright for comfortable viewing at night especially. But I say say this much, when I have the thing turned up to normal brightness with the vivid color on it is spectacular. Combine that with their AI and it's mind-blowing.


 

@SilleeMee @gardenman   My research said burn in is only a risk if you have the same static image on for hours a day, for many many days, which I guess some gamers do.  (I don't "game".  Maybe a card game on my macbook every once in a while.  No ghosting from that.)  As long as the images are varied, there is no burn in.  There may be "ghosting". from leaving a static image for a few hours at a time, but even that ghosting goes away if the TV is changed to varied content for a period of time.


 

 

@NYCLatinaMe 

Yes, exactly. Static images are a no no for any kind of screen. That's why animated screen savers were invented.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,638
Registered: ‎05-22-2010

I upgraded from a 32" to a 43" last year and boy, even with that difference I am amazed that this "bigger" set lets me see all the bags and wrinkles on some of the hosts when they do close ups.   Find it really funny when they are showing those expensive creams that are supposed to eliminate them.  What do they look like on those massive big screen tvs?

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,303
Registered: ‎06-19-2011

@coffee drinker    the studio cameras control what is on the screens

 

the size of the tv's screen make no difference 

 

mrshckynut 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,986
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

We have a 65" one downstairs. I remember when we got it. We went to an independent store where it was one of the demo models. It had been up only a few days. We took a long time deciding on it and another one. Both had "special prices" of course!

 

 

They had an interior designer in the store. She took the dimensions of our room and saw some pictures. We talked about where we sit. Although we were tempted by the other one, which was larger, she thought it would overpower our room. 

 

 

We went back the next afternoon. It was college football bowl season. DH said if they could deliver it before his college played in their bowl (a few days) we would buy the display model. They could and they did! We love it! 

 

If I have QVC on and I get very close to the screen, I can see the pores on their skin!  Smiley Wink

 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,171
Registered: ‎01-14-2017

Re: Gigantic TVs

[ Edited ]

@chlema wrote:

I upgraded from a 32" to a 43" last year and boy, even with that difference I am amazed that this "bigger" set lets me see all the bags and wrinkles on some of the hosts when they do close ups.   Find it really funny when they are showing those expensive creams that are supposed to eliminate them.  What do they look like on those massive big screen tvs?


 

@chlema @beach-mom I really only watch QVC videos from the website on my 16" LED screen macbook which has up to 4K resolution, though I do not know what is the resolution of the QVC videos.  On my macbook, if they do face close-ups, I can see facial wrinkles and pores, which are OK, but the varying splotches of face make-up are ... interesting.  I think that makeup is what they needed for the old TVs, but with high resolution, the make-up applications are ... interesting.  Not sure what other people see.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,316
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

Re: Gigantic TVs

[ Edited ]

None of the home shopping channels, or most any other channel, broadcast in 4K resolution. It's all HD not 4K. Very few channels come in 4K but more are changing. Plus you need 4K compatible hardware to view it.