Reply
Super Contributor
Posts: 363
Registered: ‎11-23-2015

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

It looks disgusting and the kid will become a vapid drain on society like its parents. I refuse to acknowledge someone who puts an animals body on themselves. 

And yes unless it is synthetic it most certainly is not faux. Some poor animal was mutilated to be worn and tossed by this kid and her disgusting family.

 

No fan of these wastrels or anyone who kills animals for fashion

 

This is my opinion by all means if you do not agree so be it.


 

 

I had an opinion, but someone didn't like it and it was removed.

 

Just wondering if you feel this strongly about meat eaters? 

 

 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,426
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@Noel7 wrote:

@HappyDaze wrote:

@songbird wrote:

@Lucky Charm wrote:

@songbird wrote:

@ladyroxanne wrote:

i hope it's not real.  that would be tragic.

 

In Russia many children wear real fur.  They can't use fake fur, because it's not warm enugh.



That looks a lot like Khloe as a baby.


The child is Russian and NOT an eskimo. 


LOL! This child, according to online, is a Chukchi child. Chukuchi people are Russian Eskimos!  So yes, the child is both Russian AND and Eskimo. lol.

 

Definition of Eskimo: "a member of an indigenous people inhabiting northern Canada, Alaska, Greenland, and eastern Siberia, traditionally living by hunting (especially of seals) and by fishing"

 

Siberia is part of Russian terroritory.

 

FYI: I apologize to anyone who takes offense to the term "Eskimo" as it can be offensive to some.


***************************

 

You and I are on the same page Smiley Happy

 

I hear you about the term "Eskimo," but it is listed as part of the official title.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chukchi_people


This child unlike the other one is actually wearing this for warmth not a fashion statement to be tossed aside because her vapid mother probably has a gazillion others to showcase.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,235
Registered: ‎03-13-2010

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........

Don't like the look - faux or not. 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,959
Registered: ‎05-13-2012

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@Ladybug724 wrote:

Hey Kim, I guess you've never heard of Garanimals?  Or Gymboree?  Baby Gap maybe?


I agree!  There are so many precious clothes out there for children, especially cute for girls, why would anyone actually want to dress their child like a 40 year old??  The family is nuts, period.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,415
Registered: ‎11-25-2011

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

 

 No fan of ...... anyone who kills animals for fashion

 


@AngusandBuddhasMom

Warms my heart you're embracing being a Vegan!

It's one thing to embrace a plant-base dietary lifestyle, but ethical reasons takes it to the next level.   PETA thanks you! 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,426
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@sidsmom wrote:

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

 

 No fan of ...... anyone who kills animals for fashion

 


@AngusandBuddhasMom

Warms my heart you're embracing being a Vegan!

It's one thing to embrace a plant-base dietary lifestyle, but ethical reasons takes it to the next level.   PETA thanks you! 


I question  PETA they allow the killing of too many fur babies. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,415
Registered: ‎11-25-2011

Re: FUR ON A 2 YEAR OLD...........


@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

@sidsmom wrote:

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

 

 No fan of ...... anyone who kills animals for fashion

 


@AngusandBuddhasMom

Warms my heart you're embracing being a Vegan!

It's one thing to embrace a plant-base dietary lifestyle, but ethical reasons takes it to the next level.   PETA thanks you! 


I question  PETA they allow the killing of too many fur babies. 


At least the majority of those, like yourself, which are dietary, environmental & ethical Vegans will still make a difference.  Thank you for your commitment.