Reply
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 146
Registered: ‎03-15-2017

Hi all!  A good friend of mine has been married a few years.  She married later in life (in her late fifties and so is her husband).  Her husband bought a house (very expensive) when they married and they live in it (about two years).  Their arrangement is he pays the mortgage and property taxes (from income from his sole investments).  She pays for all the household bills (electric, water, etc.) and buys the groceries and pays for vacations.  Now, her question to me is do I think that's fair.  He owns the house and when the time comes to sell or if either one dies, he gets all the proceeds except for the difference in any equity on the property which would be split 50/50 (assuming property values continue to rise).  She has invested over $40,000 of her own money on updates to the home.   They each have their separate accounts and no joint accounts.  He has stopped working and she continues to earn a salary. 

 

What are you're thoughts on their arrangement.  Fair or not? 

Super Contributor
Posts: 284
Registered: ‎10-19-2016

Re: FAIR OR NOT FAIR

[ Edited ]

if her name is on the house I don't see a problem. Do they file joint income taxes? I had a similar arrangement until I quit working. Worked out well.  I would assume he contributes to the IRAs' savings and other investments.  

Super Contributor
Posts: 495
Registered: ‎09-12-2015

If they agreed to this at one time, it's fair.  If she wants to renegotiate the agreement, that's fair, too.   Good luck.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 41,451
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

if it wasnt what she wanted or wasnt "FAIR" at the time they decided to do this, then she probably should not be complaining. is the house ONLY in his name?

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 146
Registered: ‎03-15-2017

The house is in his name only.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 41,451
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@Spinach30 wrote:

The house is in his name only.


 

 

i cannot believe she agreed to that......and if she did, then she made a big mistake.

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 146
Registered: ‎03-15-2017

@Adamlambert wrote:

if her name is on the house I don't see a problem. Do they file joint income taxes? I had a similar arrangement until I quit working. Worked out well.  I would assume he contributes to the IRAs' savings and other investments.  


 

 

Theyt have no joint accounts or investments.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,787
Registered: ‎02-20-2017

She should have her name on the house.

 

If she doesn't think it's fair, she needs to bring it up to her husband so they can work out a solution.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 41,451
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

i sure do hope they both have wills!

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,902
Registered: ‎03-12-2010

Fair, but maybe not smart on her part. Why did she invest $40K in "his" house? If for her taste and/or comfort, then OK. Sounds like she's having second thoughts after the fact.