Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,270
Registered: ‎04-20-2012

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

But how did she give it to them?

She cleaned surfaces. She probably left traces on equipment or tables.

So, it could be communicable without the passing of body fluids to someone else?

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,953
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 bikerbabe said: No. Surfaces were probably not cleaned properly and had human contaminants.


Yes, or something as simple as not washing a spoon after she used it.

A Thrill Of Hope The Weary World Rejoices
Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,953
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

But how did she give it to them?

She cleaned surfaces. She probably left traces on equipment or tables.

So, it could be communicable without the passing of body fluids to someone else?

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?


No one made any claim, there are numerous possibilities.

A Thrill Of Hope The Weary World Rejoices
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,270
Registered: ‎04-20-2012

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

But how did she give it to them?

She cleaned surfaces. She probably left traces on equipment or tables.

So, it could be communicable without the passing of body fluids to someone else?

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?


No one made any claim, there are numerous possibilities.

Okay, so now there are NUMEROUS POSSIBLITIES.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,954
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?

They were working in a Third World country with primitive conditions...not like the USA.

I trust the scientists and medical people who say he is free from Ebola and can continue on with his life with no fear of infecting anyone.

Since when did Trump become a medical expert?

I trust the doctors.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,270
Registered: ‎04-20-2012

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 terrier3 said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?

They were working in a Third World country with primitive conditions...not like the USA.

I trust the scientists and medical people who say he is free from Ebola and can continue on with his life with no fear of infecting anyone.

Since when did Trump become a medical expert?

I trust the doctors.

Why did you mention Trump? I certainly did not. Doctors and scientists are human and make mistakes.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,954
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 terrier3 said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?

They were working in a Third World country with primitive conditions...not like the USA.

I trust the scientists and medical people who say he is free from Ebola and can continue on with his life with no fear of infecting anyone.

Since when did Trump become a medical expert?

I trust the doctors.

Why did you mention Trump? I certainly did not. Doctors and scientists are human and make mistakes.

Someone else mentioned him.

I trust the doctors, they would never make a mistake and release someone into the general population who could infect others...especially since they are both medical workers.

I didn't second guess the MD who delivered my son - I'm not going to second guess the doctors and the NIH on this either.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,953
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

But how did she give it to them?

She cleaned surfaces. She probably left traces on equipment or tables.

So, it could be communicable without the passing of body fluids to someone else?

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?


No one made any claim, there are numerous possibilities.

Okay, so now there are NUMEROUS POSSIBLITIES.


To come in contact with bodily fluids? Uh, yeah.

Surely you've thought that through about catching a cold or the flu and coming in contact with a virus? On faucet handles someone used before you, on door handles, etc. This isn't rocket science.

I assume you already know that ecoli from fecal matter is found in many places, even in soda machines at fast food places.

A Thrill Of Hope The Weary World Rejoices
Super Contributor
Posts: 449
Registered: ‎10-19-2011

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 terrier3 said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 terrier3 said:
On 8/21/2014 ILikeShade said:
On 8/21/2014 NoelSeven said:

No, not unless there's live virus, and they wouldn't have been released if that was true.

So you're saying they got infected by TRACE amounts of live virus left either on equipment or tables?

They were working in a Third World country with primitive conditions...not like the USA.

I trust the scientists and medical people who say he is free from Ebola and can continue on with his life with no fear of infecting anyone.

Since when did Trump become a medical expert?

I trust the doctors.

Why did you mention Trump? I certainly did not. Doctors and scientists are human and make mistakes.

Someone else mentioned him.

I trust the doctors, they would never make a mistake and release someone into the general population who could infect others...especially since they are both medical workers.

I didn't second guess the MD who delivered my son - I'm not going to second guess the doctors and the NIH on this either.

no one knows the lasting effects of the test serum. he did explain how the serum worked, how it was created. it's a hybrid and like any virus if it evolves the serum will no longer work. this is from a top doctor in the country.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 11,367
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Doc who had EBOLA to be released today

On 8/21/2014 herekitty_kitty said:

no one knows the lasting effects of the test serum. he did explain how the serum worked, how it was created. it's a hybrid and like any virus if it evolves the serum will no longer work. this is from a top doctor in the country.

Kitty, I would think that would be for future recipients. Not the Samaritans Purse doctor. I belive that he is now cured and will have no recurrance of the disease...unless it works like malaria or something which I have not heard it does.