Community Chat

[scotttie]

On 6/23/2014 croemer said:

On 6/23/2014 Sedonee said:

When you get banned for the most ridiculous reasons and you see others posting much worse things and nothing is done...well...it gets old.

Agreed!!!

Exactly.

[raven-blackbird]

On 6/23/2014 azterry! said:

On 6/23/2014 tansy said:

On 6/23/2014 dooBdoo said:

On 6/23/2014 tansy said: Having a newbie's posts monitored for a period of time would slow down the posters that come on solely to slam a poster.

That's a standard practice at well-managed boards, tansy.

I do not see why any of the established nics here would have a problem with this.

Nor do I, tansy.

I don't have a problem with it...........but I'm a realist.......and its unrealistic to think that the Q would spend the additional dollars required to ride herd on a bunch of middle aged women who can't maintain...........................................raven

[Emma bunting]

On 6/23/2014 scotttie said:

On 6/23/2014 Lotus~ said:

On 6/23/2014 scotttie said:

On 6/23/2014 Lotus~ said:

On 6/23/2014 scotttie said:

I suggested that they remove the ""last edited"" deal. It just causes more drama.

I think it is ridiculous to suggest that moderators babysit people and check their posts over first. I also think some people who want that feature might be surprised to find themselves subject to such babysitting. Sort of like when the neighborhood watch groups want a policeman on duty to stop speeders. Guess who gets a ticket? Yup. The ones who wanted the policeman.

ITA....they should just ban the chronic offenders and the multiple nic posters...just sayin'!!

I agree. I suspect there are quite a few of us who wouldn't make the cut.

No worries here!

Really? After what you called someone the other day? And after you started that nasty shout out thread? I doubt that would cut it with this new type of moderation LOL!

hmmmm......I'm starting to see the benefits of this new type of moderation.......

[scotttie]

On 6/23/2014 nunya said:

um I've seem quite a few people swear at others here. Let's be fair.

That's right. But what is funny is the ones who think they are above it all are offenders as well.

[dooBdoo]

On 6/23/2014 Buck-i-Nana said:

Come on folks, can we PLEASE stop the bickering so this thread doesn't get deleted? I'd really like everyone to see and hopefully participate in making suggestions to improve things.

I already get it, some of you cannot get along regardless of WHAT the topic is.

This bears repeating, imo.

[Buck-i-Nana]

I hope all of you who are posting suggestions here are going to the Share your Top Five on the community page and submitting these suggestions officially. I doubt they will be seen here even if this thread survives and it appears at least a couple of folks are going to continue to do what they can to have the thread poofed, intentionally or un.

[Sedonee]

On 6/23/2014 nunya said:

um I've seem quite a few people swear at others here. Let's be fair.

Fairness would be banning ALL of them, not just a few select ones now wouldn't it?

[raven-blackbird]

On 6/23/2014 nunya said:

um I've seem quite a few people swear at others here. Let's be fair.

I had someone here swear and me and ya know what happened............SQUAT........................raven

[Emma bunting]

On 6/23/2014 nunya said:

um I've seem quite a few people swear at others here. Let's be fair.

Yup. And name call, etc. Definitely should not be tolerated.

[Buck-i-Nana]

On 6/23/2014 scotttie said:

On 6/23/2014 nunya said:

um I've seem quite a few people swear at others here. Let's be fair.

That's right. But what is funny is the ones who think they are above it all are offenders as well.

As I've said before in this thread, wouldn't that be a good thing? Some people cannot see in themselves what they so clearly see in those around them.

A little taste of moderation can be an excellent teacher.