Community Chat

[Oznell]

Agreed, the Brits are interesting to watch in their sales pitches-- there are slightly different emphases on aspects of the various products, which can be fascinating and even amusing. 

As far as modesty vs. more body display, it's a choice, like anything else  People who cover more can be doing so for a variety of reasons, as can those who cover less.  Aesthetically, I lean more to the almost eccentrically modest "Diane Keaton school"-- at least, the young Diane Keaton.  I haven't followed her enough recently to know if she still dresses the way she used to.  She quirkily covered almost everything, wore high necks, long skirts and trousers, someone joked that oven mitts were part of her ensembles, and combat boots!  She looked whimsical and fun.

I also think men who wear standard business attire, which is traditionally very covered up, are at their most appealing.  Conversely, guys who break out their sandals at every opportunity, not a fave look to me, ha.  Just personal preference.

[SuhseK]

Oh mercy me(was that said in 1952?)I wasnt born, till 20 years later, so, I'm 🤔 unsure. 

---

@chrystaltree wrote:

Unbelievable....     Sounds like OP dropped down from 1952.

---

--------------------

I obviously did a really poor job of communicating, with this post.  

I have no problem with cleavage, nor, for that matter language.  Some of the best, most caring and generous people I know, have, a Very colorful vocabulary!

I kind of stumbled on those video's, and they made me think, about how the host would be received here, based on many of the, "I'm no prude, but----" posts, I've seen.  

It made me chuckle, but, I guess, I way missed the Mark!