Community Chat

[CrazyDaisy]

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@CrazyDaisy wrote:

Terrible, hope the injured are not serious.

Thought they had pretty strict gun ownership laws.

---

And your point?

---

Well everytime a shooting occurs the discussion automatically goes to gun control/ownership.  So here we are.

[Yardlie]

OMG...what is this world coming to?

[Yardlie]

---

@CrazyDaisy wrote:

Terrible, hope the injured are not serious.

Thought they had pretty strict gun ownership laws.

---

It just seems that no matter how strict the gun ownership laws, if a lunatic wants to get their hands on a gun, they will find a way. Sad, but true.

[ROMARY]

Just guessing that the bad guys don't give up their guns. 

[AngusandBuddhasMom]

---

@Puzzle Piece wrote:

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@CrazyDaisy wrote:

Terrible, hope the injured are not serious.

Thought they had pretty strict gun ownership laws.

---

And your point?

---

Strict laws are not obeyed by all and that is everywhere in the world. 

---

Oh I see. So I guess we should get rid of Gun Laws all together? Because gun owners can say see I told you so. So sick of this.

Unless you are an active Military member or LE. Your right to a gun that shoots more then 5 bullets does not supersede my right to live. 

[Mellie32]

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

---

Oh I see. So I guess we should get rid of Gun Laws all together? Because gun owners can say see I told you so. So sick of this.

Unless you are an active Military member or LE. Your right to a gun that shoots more then 5 bullets does not supersede my right to live. 

---

Why 5?  That means 5 people could die by that gun.  Why should that be legal?

[CrazyDaisy]

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@Puzzle Piece wrote:

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@CrazyDaisy wrote:

Terrible, hope the injured are not serious.

Thought they had pretty strict gun ownership laws.

---

And your point?

---

Strict laws are not obeyed by all and that is everywhere in the world. 

---

Oh I see. So I guess we should get rid of Gun Laws all together? Because gun owners can say see I told you so. So sick of this.

Unless you are an active Military member or LE. Your right to a gun that shoots more then 5 bullets does not supersede my right to live. 

---

That may be true if you were the 6th person, to bad for the first 5 huh.

[Isobel Archer]

Well if we are so concerned about bad guys having guns, why can't we reinstate Stop and Frisk.  It's already illegal for known felons to possess guns - so why can't we search them to see if they are complying?  Why do their rights supercede those of innocent people.

The Washington Post has a recent story about kids being shot by stray bullets in their homes, on the street etc.  Why don't we care about that?

[itiswhatitis]

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

Well if we are so concerned about bad guys having guns, why can't we reinstate Stop and Frisk.  It's already illegal for known felons to possess guns - so why can't we search them to see if they are complying?  Why do their rights supercede those of innocent people.

The Washington Post has a recent story about kids being shot by stray bullets in their homes, on the street etc.  Why don't we care about that?

---

1.  The only way you can know someone is a felon is by stopping them and checking.  This is against my constitutional right (and yours) to be stopped having done nothing.

Your S&F point is moot.

I am only familiar with a couple of states that have S&F, do you live in one?  You can't just stop people to see if their criminals.