Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
06-28-2015 10:39 AM
@missy1 wrote:It was strange the mods let posters congratulate the rainbow ruling, but posters couldn't say they don't agree with it,
Missy1 - There were quite a number of negative posts...they just deleted the ones that were personal or religous attacks.
BTW - After a day or so - even the "pro thread" that I wrote was closed down.
Everyone had their say...and the moderators let us do so (while gently leading people away from personal attacks)...but now it's time to move on...it's not top of mind news anymore.
06-28-2015 10:39 AM
@september wrote:I registered for this board in 2007, and read here before that time.
Posters have been worrying about QVC shutting it down for the last 10 years. I don't think that's going to happen.
Hi september
06-28-2015 10:40 AM
06-28-2015 10:42 AM - edited 06-28-2015 10:43 AM
@terrier3 wrote:ITA, kittymomNC.
But I think an interesting dynamic has occured now that the moderators give the REASONS for their actions.
They seem quite agreeable to allowing current news comments for a day or so...they most strongly object to PERSONAL attacks.
I think it's been a VERY positive development - and the people who interject banned names, religion, overt politics - in an attempt to end ALL discussion - are being shut down pretty quickly.
I guess they find this frustrating! And they are lashing out.
I don't always agree with the mods' decisions either...but I think over time it will be a happier board.
Terrier, thank you, you have expounded very well on my comments. Some may take my post as a complaint, however that's not what it is at all. It's more a wake-up call... for the most part, I've enjoyed these boards for almost 3 years now and would hate to see them go away. But if some of these things are allowed to continue, I'm afraid the Q will give up on it. So far, I personally think the moderators are doing the best job they can... as I've said before, I wouldn't want to do their jobs!
06-28-2015 10:44 AM
@Moonchilde wrote:
missy1, posters could say they disagreed. But many posts in those disagreement threads included religion, politics and derogatory opinions of others. It has been very clearly stated that all three of those things are forum no-nos.
And most boards have these same rules. In my experience they are more strictly enforced when there are more members. I have been on boards where it was a free for all and you can really lose respect for people you generally liked before.
06-28-2015 11:04 AM
@Moonchilde wrote:
missy1, posters could say they disagreed. But many posts in those disagreement threads included religion, politics and derogatory opinions of others. It has been very clearly stated that all three of those things are forum no-nos.
____________________________________________________________________________
You are right, moonchilde.
The mods were extremely specific as to what they were going to allow on that thread. History doesn't need to be re-written here making this something it was not. Many people saw the mods instructions and tried to direct people back to them in an effort to get them to understand.
06-28-2015 11:20 AM
06-28-2015 11:22 AM - edited 06-28-2015 11:22 AM
@missy1 wrote:It was strange the mods let posters congratulate the rainbow ruling, but posters couldn't say they don't agree with it,
Missy1 - There were PLENTY of comments on the thread disagreeing. The only ones removed were those that were personal or religious attacks...and discussed 2016 elections....all banned topics.
And ONCE AGAIN - even that thread that I started is now closed.
Please listen to what numerous posters have stated here - there were LOTS of negative comments.
06-28-2015 11:26 AM - edited 06-28-2015 11:28 AM
@missy1 wrote:It was strange the mods let posters congratulate the rainbow ruling, but posters couldn't say they don't agree with it,
Although I agreed with the ruling, I also think it was very unfair to those who disagreed not to be able to voice their opinions.
Frankly, I have never cared what consenting adults do in their personal lives as long as no one is being hurt.
[I have to disclose here that I never saw the thread.]
06-28-2015 11:28 AM
@LilacTree wrote:
@missy1 wrote:It was strange the mods let posters congratulate the rainbow ruling, but posters couldn't say they don't agree with it,
Although I agreed with the ruling, I also think it was very unfair to those who disagreed not to be able to voice their opinions.
Frankly, I have never cared what consenting adults do in their personal lives as long as no one is being hurt.
Ford - they COULD disagree on my thread - just not insult people personally.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788