Ailes Out at Fox? - Page 28

Pearlee · ‎06-11-2011

@terrier3 wrote:
@Pearlee wrote:
@terrier3 wrote:
You may not want to watch it soon too yourself.
The point of removing Ailes was to change the network - start reporting more honestly and less biased.
You are entitled to your opinion, without documentation. Which means absolutely nothing to me.
I'll believe it when I see it, and not before I do. And I'm not holding my breath either.

@PearleeEnjoy it while it lasts! There has been a ton of reporting on the Murdoch sons (basically libs) and the direction they will be taking the company.
You read it here first - some hosts will be "leaving"...their time has come and gone.
You don't have to work in the industry to see the writing on the wall.
I recall posts last week that you didn't believe Ailes was going to be forced out either - and mentioned an "on air announcement" that everything was normal (Ailes had already been banned from the building).
I sold and/ or bought advertising for clients on Fox News for almost 20 years - their entire existence. It was my job to watch and know what was going on.
Now I sell against Fox News, but I still watch - its good to know what all kinds of people and all news stations think. I do like Shep Smith...he's a real newsman.

@terrier3 Clearly you read posts the way you want to see them, which isn't the truth. I never posted I "didn't believe Ailes was going to be forced out" -- if you think I did please quote my actual post - and yes, I reported Howie Kurtz broadcasting at the time that contrary to rumors Roger Ailes was still at work (that day) which was true.

It is terribly frustrating to deal with you when you misread and/or misinterpret my posts, and to be misquoted back to myself. Your interpretation of my posts is just so often ---wrong. You see what you want to see, not necessarily what I'm posting.

I don't care if some people currently employed by Fox leaves. And a change in on-air personnel doesn't necesarily mean a change in direction of the network. Furthermore, you rarely cite your sources, other than yourself so I take that with more than one grain of salt.

Once again, I'll believe the changes when I actually see them, and I'm not holding my breath. I will say that your posts would be far more creidble if, like many on this board, you provided links to your sources.