Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
09-30-2016 06:47 PM
First, if Charles had been allowed to marry a commoner, he would have picked Camilla first since she was the one he loved. Second, the queen can't just pick her successor. Charles is next in line, the only way William would be king is if Charles died, or relinquished the throne. Next, Camilla and Kate will never be called princess because neither one has royal blood. Diana was only princess Diana because she had royal blood. The English people actual like Camilla, it's the Americans who dislike her.
09-30-2016 06:59 PM
Which Palace is Kate going to get in her settlement? Kensington? Cow-Milla is such a troublemaker. (Joke).
Camilla was a very attractive 20-something way back when.
09-30-2016 07:31 PM
I'm thinkin' "very attractive" is subjective.
09-30-2016 07:41 PM
At least she had "good hair"...
09-30-2016 07:45 PM
@ritasNo1Fan wrote:At least she had "good hair"...
And lots of money to insure it was kept up well ;-)
10-01-2016 01:31 PM
Camilla looks like a 'young' thinner Adelle in those earlier photos. (No offense to Adelle). Glad you dug those up to share! @Moonchilde
10-01-2016 01:52 PM
@Irshgrl31201 wrote:I thought Charles had no chance to be king anyway. I thought the queen had chosen William as her successor? Is that not so?
I wouldn't worry about it . . . Queen Elizabeth is never going to die.
10-02-2016 08:44 AM
@Drythe wrote:
@KathyPet wrote:SO I guess Charles was supposed to be in love with Diana because she was so pretty and not love Camilla because she is not? Rather shallow thinking isn't it?
Pretty, not pretty, no matter to me.
But, Charles was 32, when he proposed to Diana who was 19 & he had known Camilla for a very long time. Why didn't he just wait and marry Camilla, surely he must have known his feelings; instead he actively persued Diana not vice versa.
I'm romantic enough to think you're supposed to marry the one you love. Though I know in the case of royal matches that is not always the case.
Drythe...Camilla was too old to produce children, Diana was 19, a very sad story, I wonder how Diana's boys really feel about their father.
10-02-2016 08:58 AM
@Moonchilde wrote:I'm thinkin' "very attractive" is subjective.
She looks very ordinary with bad teeth. Yet, obviously there was chemistry between her and Charles that over rode propiety. The queen seems to accept and like Camilla whereas her relationship with Diana seemed strained. This could have been influenced by her knowledge of Charle's choice to remain faithful to Camilla throughout his marriage...just so sad for Diana.
10-02-2016 09:03 AM
@VAbelle wrote:Camilla looks like a 'young' thinner Adelle in those earlier photos. (No offense to Adelle). Glad you dug those up to share! @Moonchilde
Adelle MUCH more attractive than Camilla...and I'm sure more personable.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788