Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
08-21-2015 05:26 PM
@Irshgrl31201 I just can't comprehend something like his wife maybe knowing he did what he did and then still marrying him. I think the children need to be checked for any tampering on his part. They need protection from him because I don't think Anna will provide it.
08-21-2015 05:28 PM
08-21-2015 05:28 PM
I don't have kids but I know enough that you have to let them grow up and live life from early on. The problem is these kids can't watch tv, can only listen to religious music, only homeschooled, can't play or interact with others, must marry someone daddy approves of, have a chaperone at all times, have a ton of kids. They are products of their environment. Then they get old enough to leave the nest, if they are a boy, and it's like a kid in a candy store. I bet Josh finally got to meet other young people and discovered what he had been missing all these years. Probably the first time he could use a computer was at work where he commingled with other coworkers and discovered things previously kept under wraps by ma and pa Duggar. If they had raised him to experience life as he should he might have turned out differently.
08-21-2015 05:37 PM
@Venezia wrote:
@SharkE wrote:Judge not least ye be judged. Not up to us to condemn him. That will be up to someone else.
That's taking the Biblical quote too far. If we were never to "judge", there would be no laws, no courts, no prisons. Anyone could do whatever he wanted to with no repercussions. We'd live in a totally lawless society.
I've never watched "The Duggars" but I've certainly heard about them. I can't say I'm impressed by their actions.
You all missed the point. I'm not saying let him walk or others like him . What I meant to put over to the original poster was the law will handle it and it's not up to people in a public forum to throw stones and start a flame. People can read and watch TV .
08-21-2015 05:40 PM
@Puzzle Piece wrote:@Irshgrl31201 I just can't comprehend something like his wife maybe knowing he did what he did and then still marrying him. I think the children need to be checked for any tampering on his part. They need protection from him because I don't think Anna will provide it.
I think she would offer zero protection from those kids too. I can't comprehend knowing that and marrying someone anyway either but that is what has been said that she knew before she married him.
08-21-2015 05:44 PM
@SharkE wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
@SharkE wrote:Judge not least ye be judged. Not up to us to condemn him. That will be up to someone else.
That's taking the Biblical quote too far. If we were never to "judge", there would be no laws, no courts, no prisons. Anyone could do whatever he wanted to with no repercussions. We'd live in a totally lawless society.
I've never watched "The Duggars" but I've certainly heard about them. I can't say I'm impressed by their actions.
You all missed the point. I'm not saying let him walk or others like him . What I meant to put over to the original poster was the law will handle it and it's not up to people in a public forum to throw stones and start a flame. People can read and watch TV .
I am sorry, I am the original poster and work in an industry where I see MORE THAN MY SHARE of abuse vitims, whose perpetrators get off most the time with a slap on the wrist. AND I listen all day long to exhaustive excuses as to why and how the abuse happens. I also escaped an abusive relationship, where my ex went unpunished by the law. SORRY if we annoy you with our thoughts and opinions on this subject, some of us DO NOT LIKE TO SEE CHILDREN ABUSED. We ARE NO(T JUDGING< HE HAS ADMITTED TO IT (molestration) AND HAS GONE UNPUNISHED>>
08-21-2015 05:49 PM
After the law weighs in on the case . All you can do is have faith that they will get theirs in the bye and bye.
End of discussion from me.
08-21-2015 05:52 PM
@SharkE wrote:After the law weighs in on the case . All you can do is have faith that they will get theirs in the bye and bye.
End of discussion from me.
The "LAW" weighed in on the molestration charges and let them slide, meanwhile there are several young girls who have been abused..an got NO HELP...doesn't bother you at all?
08-21-2015 05:55 PM
08-21-2015 06:12 PM - edited 08-21-2015 06:14 PM
The Duggars (Mother, father, and Josh) are all lying sacks. First they lied to the media by diminishing Josh's actions in the molestations and then forced the molested sisters to lie to the media to also diminish his actions, then they ducked the media for a few months, then courted the media again for a new TLC "special" and People cover this week, and then they attempted to diminish things yet again this week by changing Josh's professions of guilt this week about his porn problem to simply illicit affairs and they eliminated the statement he made about also having a porn addiction.
The people on this board that went so far to the wall defending these lying sacks after the revelation of his first set of transgressions no doubt feel incredibly duped. But, thinking for yourself isn't something his defenders and Duggar defenders exercised and so I think they deserved to be duped.
The rest of us KNEW the other shoe would drop on these holier than thou losers sooner than later.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788