Community Chat

[hyacinth003]

I mostly address those who found "reasonable" doubt, or thought the prosecution didn't prove its case.

Caylee was last known to be in the custody of her mother, Casey Anthony. When finally confronted with her absence (by her frantic grandmother), her mother claimed she was taken by her nanny. Oops, the nanny didn't even exsist.

When it was determined that the nanny didn't exsist, what was the alternate explanation of where Caylee was? She was asked by the police over and over. They even offered the possibility that she had an accident in the swimming pool. Casey denied that. Her parents (in the jailhouse tapes) gave her an opportunity to say there had been an accident. Nope, she says "surprise, surprise." Answer: there was NO accounting by Casey Anthony after blaming the nanny of where her daughter was.

Not until the trial, that is. Her attorney said it was a tragic swimming accident. But Casey had denied that over and over. She sat in jail for 3 years, accused of murder, and never reported the accident? I don't think so.

George Anthony helped her cover it up according to her attorneys. Never in a million years do I believe he'd leave Caylee to rot in a swamp. Maybe we should question George in the JFK assassination conspiracies too.

There was no proven cause of death. Uh, her body had decomposed in a SWAMP leaving NOTHING to test. There was nothing but the words of defense attorneys to say she drowned. Opening statments are NOT evidence.

Please answer where Casey SAID her daughter was after the nanny was exposed to be a lie and I'll consider reasonable doubt.

Hyacinth