A Tattoo on your foot? On a model showing shoes...... - Page 7

lulu2 · ‎03-09-2010

Skechers (the company) does not seem to have a problem with their rep sporting a small tattoo on her foot while presenting their products.

Rather than complain about QVC allowing this our air, why not express your displeasure to Skechers?

jaxs mom · ‎04-18-2012

@Puppy Lips wrote:
@Candyapple wrote:
The narrow mindedness of some people in this world amazes me. 😏
How is not liking tatoos narrow-minded, exactly?

It's not the disliking them that's the issue. It's wanting to limit the career choices of someone based on your not liking someone elses tattoo that's narrowminded.

Don't Change Your Authenticity for Approval

SeaMaiden · ‎03-10-2010

@HappyDaze wrote:
@SeaMaiden wrote:
@HappyDaze wrote:
By the way, before you pass judgement too much, you should see all the tattoos and piercings many of the amazing scientists have that I work with and that develop many of the drugs you or family members use to keep yourself alive and healthy. I am sure if they were presenting you with the drug that could keep you alive, like a cancer drug, you would not hesitate to take the drug just because of their "distracting" tattoos. Or maybe you would and then you might just pass up the one drug that could keep you alive. Just something to think about and to keep things in perspective.
This is the most ridiculous comparison I have ever seen! Like a "HUH?" Moment 😄
It is unfortunate you did not "get" it but honestly not unexpected. Too bad.

@HappyDaze Amazing scientists are not modeling shoes or fashion on TV first of all. Yes, I am sure that amazing scientists have tats and piercings, but this has nothing to do with this subject. No scientist is selling me Life saving drugs wearing tats. But, your comparison is entertaining and cute... 🤡

SeaMaiden · ‎03-10-2010

@Lipstickdiva wrote:
@hyacinth003 wrote:
I personally don't like tattoos on women anywhere, anytime. My brain just doesn't get them!

I am also puzzled by models tattooing themselves.

I find them distracting when looking at any apparel.

Hyacinth
The model didn't have the tattoo. The skechers vendor did. The thread title is incorrect.

@LipstickdivaPardon me...the sketchers vendor WAS modeling the shoes. The cameras were on her foot and her tat...she was modeling.

muttmom · ‎11-28-2012

For what it's worth, they are SKECHERS not SKETCHERS.

HappyDaze · ‎06-13-2012

@jaxs mom wrote:
@Puppy Lips wrote:
@Candyapple wrote:
The narrow mindedness of some people in this world amazes me. 😏
How is not liking tatoos narrow-minded, exactly?
It's not the disliking them that's the issue. It's wanting to limit the career choices of someone based on your not liking someone elses tattoo that's narrowminded.

Excellent point, @jaxs mom.

tennpal15 · ‎03-09-2010

That tattoo is better looking than those shoes.

NativeJax · ‎01-27-2015

I could care less...

Glad the Q doesn't care either....

If it was on her face I might care but on her foot, really doesn't seem that big of a deal.

You know what I would love to see is the Q hire disabled model. I bet there are many disabled Q shoppers.

ID2 · ‎06-25-2012

Lol! I got my first tattoo last year at the ripe age of 62. I have two now and was just starting to look for my next one on, yes, you guessed it....my foot! Love my tattoos!

"Pure Michigan"

sidsmom · ‎11-25-2011

@jaxs mom wrote:
@Puppy Lips wrote:
@Candyapple wrote:
The narrow mindedness of some people in this world amazes me. 😏
How is not liking tatoos narrow-minded, exactly?
It's not the disliking them that's the issue. It's wanting to limit the career choices of someone based on your not liking someone elses tattoo that's narrowminded.

You're right...this is not about disliking tattoos.

With many careers...yes, you DO limit yourself to certain career choices

w/ the type/placement of certain permanent markings.

I would guess if the tattoo was offensive, this thread dialogue

would be much, much different.