A Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars + - Page 4

Tinkrbl44 · ‎08-23-2010

@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

@Noel7 @sophiamarie

In both cases, "Not guilty" is not the same as "Innocent".

Maudelynn · ‎05-08-2015

@sophiamarie wrote:
@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

***************************************************************************************************
Yes, so was OJ. Your point??? The topic was GZ and his gun. He was found "not guilty" and the gun belonged to him. Who should have destroyed it?

It should have been taken from him by LE after the first time he threatened one of his girlfriends with a firearm. There have been several incidents where GZ has exhibited violent tendencies. That should be enough to preclude an individual from being able to own a weapon.

You have sacrificed nothing and no one.

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

@sophiamarie wrote:
@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

***************************************************************************************************
Yes, so was OJ. Your point??? The topic was GZ and his gun. He was found "not guilty" and the gun belonged to him. Who should have destroyed it?

*******************************************

@sophiamarie

Your comment was my point. Just because someone was found Not Guilty doesn't mean they weren't guilty.

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:
@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

@Noel7 @sophiamarie

In both cases, "Not guilty" is not the same as "Innocent".

**********************************

@Tinkrbl44

That's right.

QueenDanceALot · ‎04-18-2013

Did the slimebag get the money or was the 120 grand just the final bid?

Maybe he'll never see a penny of it.

Tinkrbl44 · ‎08-23-2010

@QueenDanceALot wrote:
Did the slimebag get the money or was the 120 grand just the final bid?

Maybe he'll never see a penny of it.

@QueenDanceALot

The final bid IS the winning bid.

Irshgrl31201 · ‎03-18-2010

I have no doubt this man will get what he has coming to him. You would think even if he didn't give a darn about anyone elses feelings he would at least be bright enough to keep himself out of the news because like OJ I feel we haven't seen the last of him and I am sure a person like this won't be so smug when he gets what he has coming to him. That will be enjoyable.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK

MaggieMack · ‎10-01-2014

@Irshgrl31201, if you're a psychopath, you are the center of the world, others' feelings are meaningless. No one matters but you. Let's hope his future is the one he deserves.

No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. - Aesop

Irshgrl31201 · ‎03-18-2010

@MaggieMack wrote:
@Irshgrl31201, if you're a psychopath, you are the center of the world, others' feelings are meaningless. No one matters but you. Let's hope his future is the one he deserves.

I agree with you @MaggieMack. There are a lot that can mimic normal behavior when need be, you would think he would have the sense to to do that. He was found not guilty. YOu would think his freedom would mean more than his boasting. I don't wish harm on anyone but he is one I wouldn't mind harm coming to.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK

sophiamarie · ‎08-08-2013

@Noel7 wrote:
@Tinkrbl44 wrote:
@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

@Noel7 @sophiamarie

In both cases, "Not guilty" is not the same as "Innocent".
**********************************

@Tinkrbl44

That's right.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Florida, a "not guilty" verdict is the same as "innocent".... That's just the way it is. GZ was free to go home with the gun he owned. ------------------------------------------------