A Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars + - Page 3

Shorty2U · ‎03-09-2010

One word on the sale of this gun, pathetic.

And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make~ The Beatles

sophiamarie · ‎08-08-2013

@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed

******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?

SydneyH · ‎03-10-2010

How are comments highlighting the illegality of blocking him from future weapsons purchase deemed 'unkind'? Oh never mind, lol.

hckynut · ‎03-10-2010

@mstyrion 1 wrote:
@hckynut wrote:
We live in a free market country and that is called capitalism. I am assuming that is the price, pre-tax figure, and seems to me his attorneys or others are well aware of his, if you will, windfall.

Seems like pre-trial his X was moving $$$ around so he could declare himself indecent? Not sure what that means in relation to his attorneys, but I know they were not from a list of Public Defense Attorneys.

hnj
____________________________________________________________
Indecent is exactly the right word for him!

Good catch and I agree. I just corrected it before I read your + humor comment. =^..^=

hnj

hckynut(john)

Noel7 · ‎03-09-2010

@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?

*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.

ladyroxanne · ‎03-09-2010

no words to express how awful this is, but the positve thing is he can never hurt anyone with this weaon again.

Lila Belle · ‎01-24-2013

Let's hope that the murder weapon is not used again for the same purpose.

scatcat · ‎03-15-2010

No outrage for the person who shelled out $120k?

SeaMaiden · ‎03-10-2010

@scatcat wrote:
No outrage for the person who shelled out $120k?

ITA! @scatcat What sicko woukd want that gun at all?

sophiamarie · ‎08-08-2013

@Noel7 wrote:
@sophiamarie wrote:
@fourpaws56 wrote:
discusting, JMHO, the gun should have been destroyed
******************************************************************************************************The gun belonged to Mr. Z. Who should have destroyed it? He was found "not guilty", remember?
*************************************************

He was found Not Guilty?

So was OJ.