Community Chat

[Catitude]

On 1/8/2015 CouponQueen said:

On 1/8/2015 Smaug said:

On 1/8/2015 Cattitude said:

Married male pushing 70, likely on Viagra, meets a married female tramp, they get their sleaze on, all the while maintaining they both want to remain married. Allegedly it was the female tramp's idea to end it because he was getting much too clingy for her and she said she never wanted a divorce. Their marriage vows obviously mean nothing to them. And I pity the stupid spouses who forgive and take them back.

Why is she a "tramp" and he's just a married male "likely on Viagra"?

Why is she called names? It takes TWO to do this tango...

You missed the deleted posts. Somebody was very determined to have this thread removed but they didn't get their way.

He was called a choice name or two but the censors caught it.

[Catitude]

On 1/8/2015 CouponQueen said:

We need to know this why?

It is his personal business. I don't even know who he is...but still...

I opened it trying to figure out why it was important since I didn't know who he was lol

Feel better now that you gave your lecture?

[croemer]

On 1/8/2015 Deb1010again said:

On 1/8/2015 croemer said:

Lots of things do not affect our private lives but we do come here and discuss them.

Exactly, and that's why I brought it here. I thought it was fascinating and I was wondering what our various viewpoints would be on this.

Deb, don't let it upset you. This is a tactic to shut the conversation down...many items like this have been discussed...jus' matters "WHO" is being discussed whether deemed important.

[brii]

I don't have a problem with the topic at all.

This is Viewpoints...

[croemer]

On 1/8/2015 brii said:

I don't have a problem with the topic at all.

This is Viewpoints...

[BeckiWV]

I don't have a problem at all with this topic being on Viewpoints.

What I don't like is the press digging these kinds of things up and calling it news in the first place. Once it's out there, people may as well talk about it, shoot.

That is all I meant by my earlier post, so I apologize Deb, if I looked like I was giving you a hard time about it. That was not my intent.

I thought maybe somebody at Page Six didn't like this guy and decided to fix his wagon.

[croemer]

On 1/8/2015 BeckiWV said:

I don't have a problem at all with this topic being on Viewpoints.

What I don't like is the press digging these kinds of things up and calling it news in the first place. Once it's out there, people may as well talk about it, shoot.

That is all I meant by my earlier post, so I apologize Deb, if I looked like I was giving you a hard time about it. That was not my intent.

I thought maybe somebody at Page Six didn't like this guy and decided to fix his wagon.

Well said Becki.

[Deb1010again]

On 1/8/2015 croemer said:

On 1/8/2015 Deb1010again said:

On 1/8/2015 croemer said:

Lots of things do not affect our private lives but we do come here and discuss them.

Exactly, and that's why I brought it here. I thought it was fascinating and I was wondering what our various viewpoints would be on this.

Deb, don't let it upset you. This is a tactic to shut the conversation down...many items like this have been discussed...jus' matters "WHO" is being discussed whether deemed important.

Thanks so much Croemer. I don't let any of this bother me. I feel entitled to bring anything here for discussion. If people don't want to discuss a certain topic they can just avoid it.

Still, thanks for all your encouragement! You're a sweetie!

[Blahblahvampemer]

Three years of bad judgement, gets busted, and now he wants to fix his marriage. Uh huh.

[brewhaha]

His wife should leave him. He kroft the line.