Community Chat

[PIT-HAG Melissa]

beammeupscottie- Juan Martinez put her husband or Boyfriend away...Is that what you mean?

Susie- I can NOT wrap my head around"we will kill you for not giving the death penalty to a murder"

SeaGal- You're welcome..I would just like to see her COMPLETELY OUT of the public eye...PERIOD!

terrier,mstryion- ITA- don't think it will EVER happen..

KittyLou- Hola..

Thank you for the responses...

HAPPY TUESDAY!

[SeaGal]

On 3/17/2015 SusieQ_2 said:

As far as the juror goes, I believe someone said it's Juan's fault for not removing her. If that's the case, and Juan bears that responsibility, then juror 17 is responsible for putting herself in the public eye knowing there would be backlash regarding her deception and refusal to deliberate.

How can Juan possibly remember EVERY face he has ever come across in the courtroom. On day one juror 17 should have stepped up and mentoned the fact she had ties to a defendent he prosecuted to see if there was an issue with that. That is even aside from any other hang ups she may have had as sitting juror in this case.

[PIT-HAG Melissa]

On 3/17/2015 SeaGal said:

On 3/17/2015 SusieQ_2 said:

As far as the juror goes, I believe someone said it's Juan's fault for not removing her. If that's the case, and Juan bears that responsibility, then juror 17 is responsible for putting herself in the public eye knowing there would be backlash regarding her deception and refusal to deliberate.

How can Juan possibly remember EVERY face her has ever come across in the courtroom. On day one juror 17 should have stepped up and mentoned the fact she had ties to a defendent he prosecuted. That is even aside from any issue she may have had as sitting juror in this case.

She SAYS she forgot... I think that is questionable.. HOW MANY court cases has she been involved in?

[SusieQ_2]

On 3/17/2015 Alley Catvocate said:

beammeupscottie- Juan Martinez put her husband or Boyfriend away...Is that what you mean?

Susie- I can NOT wrap my head around"we will kill you for not giving the death penalty to a murder"

SeaGal- You're welcome..I would just like to see her COMPLETELY OUT of the public eye...PERIOD!

terrier,mstryion- ITA- don't think it will EVER happen..

KittyLou- Hola..

Thank you for the responses...

HAPPY TUESDAY!

Neither can I Alley. There are a lot of things regarding this case I can't wrap my head around.

[SeaGal]

On 3/17/2015 Alley Catvocate said:

On 3/17/2015 SeaGal said:

On 3/17/2015 SusieQ_2 said:

As far as the juror goes, I believe someone said it's Juan's fault for not removing her. If that's the case, and Juan bears that responsibility, then juror 17 is responsible for putting herself in the public eye knowing there would be backlash regarding her deception and refusal to deliberate.

How can Juan possibly remember EVERY face her has ever come across in the courtroom. On day one juror 17 should have stepped up and mentoned the fact she had ties to a defendent he prosecuted. That is even aside from any issue she may have had as sitting juror in this case.

She SAYS she forgot... I think that is questionable.. HOW MANY court cases has she been involved in?

Oh geez, I am glad I wasnt drinking anything.

With all the residents in that county to pool from, what are the chances...unbelieveable

[scotttie]

On 3/17/2015 Alley Catvocate said:

beammeupscottie- Juan Martinez put her husband or Boyfriend away...Is that what you mean?

Susie- I can NOT wrap my head around"we will kill you for not giving the death penalty to a murder"

SeaGal- You're welcome..I would just like to see her COMPLETELY OUT of the public eye...PERIOD!

terrier,mstryion- ITA- don't think it will EVER happen..

KittyLou- Hola..

Thank you for the responses...

HAPPY TUESDAY!

EMT, that might be it. I haven't followed the news on this as closely as I did the original trial. Most everything I know about it I have read here.

[scotttie]

On 3/17/2015 Alley Catvocate said:

On 3/17/2015 SeaGal said:

On 3/17/2015 SusieQ_2 said:

As far as the juror goes, I believe someone said it's Juan's fault for not removing her. If that's the case, and Juan bears that responsibility, then juror 17 is responsible for putting herself in the public eye knowing there would be backlash regarding her deception and refusal to deliberate.

How can Juan possibly remember EVERY face her has ever come across in the courtroom. On day one juror 17 should have stepped up and mentoned the fact she had ties to a defendent he prosecuted. That is even aside from any issue she may have had as sitting juror in this case.

She SAYS she forgot... I think that is questionable.. HOW MANY court cases has she been involved in?

She forgot....oh well that explains it. Blech. What a liar.

[Maryann_R]

I was watching a video from fox10 news in Phoenix, and they were showing were Jodi will be staying once she is sentenced. The cells look out into outdoor recreation courtyard area. Not into a hallway like she does now. There is a bank of pay phones in the courtyard where she can use 1- 15 minute a week. After 30 days it gets way better. She can have a TV in her cell, as time goes by she will get more and more privileges. Where she is going will be way better than where she is now. It is just very wrong. Poor Travis didn't have the option of staying alive, she saw to that.

[scotttie]

On 3/17/2015 Maryann_R said:

I was watching a video from fox10 news in Phoenix, and they were showing were Jodi will be staying once she is sentenced. The cells look out into outdoor recreation courtyard area. Not into a hallway like she does now. There is a bank of pay phones in the courtyard where she can use 1- 15 minute a week. After 30 days it gets way better. She can have a TV in her cell, as time goes by she will get more and more privileges. Where she is going will be way better than where she is now. It is just very wrong. Poor Travis didn't have the option of staying alive, she saw to that.

Yes it is.

[Maryann_R]

I don't understand why people think she deserves to be treated better and more humane then the way she treated Travis, I just don't understand it.