Reply
QVC Customer Care
Posts: 2,954
Registered: ‎06-14-2015

Re: How do you feel about Philosophy using mRNA technology in its skin care?

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,091
Registered: ‎02-26-2012

Re: How do you feel about Philosophy using mRNA technology in its skin care?

In theory it doesn't bother me in the least. But I will take a wait and see approach. Sometimes things are hyped to be more and do more than what actually happens.

 

I am nearly 67 and will never have the skin I had when I was 30. So at this point, I will just see what happens with this new technology.

 

To be frank, I would rather they used the technology to cure cancer.

"What we practice daily is what we build a life on. Practice peace, love & kindness."
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,041
Registered: ‎05-09-2014

Re: How do you feel about Philosophy using mRNA technology in its skin care?

[ Edited ]

Wouldn't bother me a bit. I don't see any harm if it has beneficial results in skin care. I don't use Philosophy products, but that mRNA technology would not discourage me. 

I'm not negative about milk from cows that get hormones, although the milk commonly found in my supermarket has a disclaimer about no such treatment for the cows whose milk is sold there.  

And ditto for chicken raised with antibiotics in their feed. It's just chicken to me. Or their eggs. Whatever-- I'd never know the difference in a blind taste test. 

Well, I might as well confess I don't buy organic produce or fruit, either, or anything "free range".

 

 So far, at nearly 76, I have no reason to believe modern science has had any ill effect on me via what I eat or what I wash with, etc. I'm not ignorant; I read labels and keep up with consumer oriented science.  I just don't believe that these treatments, additives or formulations are anything but benign or that they matter much either way.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,378
Registered: ‎11-01-2010

We still don't know all of the ways it can harm humans. It has been proven to alter DNA so, it does go along with the anti human agenda. 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,091
Registered: ‎02-26-2012

1000003659.jpg 

"What we practice daily is what we build a life on. Practice peace, love & kindness."
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,102
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

absolutely NO WAY

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,645
Registered: ‎01-27-2014

Why not? I'm not afraid of this relatively new technology.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,560
Registered: ‎05-18-2017

I don't know enough about it to decide one way or another.

 

Seems like many posters on here are well informed about MRNA.

 

I'm opened minded when it comes to change.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 40,710
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

No clue what this is about. All I know about mRNA is that it's used to make certain vaccinations to help us stay free from illness...a really good thing imo.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,821
Registered: ‎10-25-2010

Millions of people lined up willingly to get the Covid vaccine which used nRNA technology.  So, I would say most people have this already in their system.

 

There have been studies that skin cancer can be helped with nRNA drugs, especially melanoma. Melanoma can be fatal.  So, you could save your life from a disease you already have.

 

I am not vaccinated from COVID, and I never had it, so I have no nRNA in my system.  But, if I had a skin cancer that could be cured or helped with mRNA technology, I'd go for it.

 

Would I use a skincare item for everyday maintence with this technology?  Probably not.

 

I am a Dove soap kinda gal who doesn't use make-up or fancy skin care. I wash my face and apply a moisturizer with sunscreen if I am going outside, and nothing if I am going to be inside all day.

 

I am not understanding why now, people don't want nRNA products when they are already loaded with this stuff though multiple vaccine usage?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.