Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,483
Registered: ‎03-19-2010

@Skyegirl21  It is not thick at all.  You can dot it on with your finger and spread with a brush.  You can also layer.  Some colors are a little creamier than others.  In those cases,  I just leave my finger on the concealer for a few secs longer.   They really brighten the under eye. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,461
Registered: ‎07-11-2010

@nyc1 wrote:

@ccassaday   I have 6 of her concealers... 11,  11.5,  22, 22.5, 33 & 33.5.  I can use them interchangably for the most part.  I use the .5 mostly on my skin and the 11, 22 & 33 primarily under my eyes.  They are very forgiving colorwise and buildable.  They definitely brighten and are FABULOUS for the undereye area. 


@nyc1  - A question if you don't mind.  I have the concealer in 22 and 22.5.  When using 22.5 under my eyes, sometimes I wish it was a bit darker or had a bit more coverage for my blueness/darkness.  Is the 33 a lot darker than 22.5?  I've been looking at pics and swatches on the RMS website but still not sure.  I'm a light medium skin tone in most of RMS products.  Was thinking maybe blending the 22.5 and the 33?  I prefer my concealers to be close to foundation shade.  Would appreciate your thoughts.  Thanks!

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,213
Registered: ‎03-09-2010
On her website I looked at the lowest reviews for her foundation and concealer and most said the colors pull yellow and the consistency is like caulk. I’m light with a rose undertone.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,461
Registered: ‎07-11-2010

@Allthingsgirly67  - Wow for what's it's worth, I have a couple of the concealers and would never consider the consistency "like caulk." 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,483
Registered: ‎03-19-2010

@JudyL   22.5 and 33 are VERY SIMILAR in color payoff.   The 33 is warmer and has less pink but is not a lot darker IMO.   The 22 is a lot lighter and brighter.   I tried taking a pic for you on both my arm and on a white sheet of paper,  but it didn't come across.  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,461
Registered: ‎07-11-2010

@nyc1 wrote:

@JudyL   22.5 and 33 are VERY SIMILAR in color payoff.   The 33 is warmer and has less pink but is not a lot darker IMO.   The 22 is a lot lighter and brighter.   I tried taking a pic for you on both my arm and on a white sheet of paper,  but it didn't come across.  


@nyc1  - You are so sweet to try and take that picture.  Thank you so much for your response.  Think I will try the 33 concealer.  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,483
Registered: ‎03-19-2010

@JudyL  From left to right...  33.5,  33 and then 22.5.   The 22.5 and 33 are so similar. RMS Concealer.jpg

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,483
Registered: ‎03-19-2010

Re: RMS Rose Marie 🤩

[ Edited ]

@JudyL .    Another view...   33.5,  33 and 22.5....  top to bottom.RMS Concealer 2.png

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,461
Registered: ‎07-11-2010

@nyc1 wrote:

@JudyL  From left to right...  33.5,  33 and then 22.5.   The 22.5 and 33 are so similar. RMS Concealer.jpg


@nyc1  - Wow, they sure are similar - 22.5 and 33.  Hmmmm.....

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,461
Registered: ‎07-11-2010

Re: RMS Rose Marie 🤩

[ Edited ]

@nyc1  By those pictures, it seems like if I want somethig a little "darker" or should I say peachier, since I use the 22.5, that I should jump up to the 33.5.  Thank you for all this.  Now to think about this for a bit and decide - stay with what I have or jump up to a different shade?