Reply
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,086
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

"Although Peter Thomas Roth as a company do not test their finished products or ingredients on animals, they nevertheless pay others to test their products on animals “where required by law”. This means that Peter Thomas Roth is not cruelty-free."

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,787
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

[ Edited ]

There seem to be so many companies like this that "don't test themselves," but their parent company does or like you said @geegerbee, have others test when a country requires it.

 

I always look at Leaping Bunny to make sure if anyting is cruelty free.

"If you walk the footsteps of a stranger, you'll learn things you never knew. Can you sing with all the voices of the mountains? can you paint with all the colors of the wind?"
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,708
Registered: ‎12-01-2023

Re: Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

It would also be difficult to acquire any type of Retinol, I'd imagine that was.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,787
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

Every time one uses his products, people should picture the rabbits or other innocent animals that are forcibly tortured and blinded by these products.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,409
Registered: ‎09-07-2014

Re: Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

I like his products and will continue to use them. My daughter was "tested" with a face product many years ago and has scarring from the product. Perhaps this may offend some but I would have preferred a human was not tested on first. 

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,947
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Peter Thomas Roth not Cruelty free---shame

PTR hasnt been cruelty-free for years. 

I stopped using them for that reason many years ago. His products arent that unique. It's easy to find cruelty-free products as dupes for his items. 

TOP