Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,997
Registered: ‎03-12-2010
On 2/25/2015 kimthib said:
On 2/24/2015 annabellethecat said:

Well, I guess if I had to vote I'd vote for the two younger girls only because maybe they haven't had a lot of work done to their faces.

I don't have an issue with plastic surgery (now they call it 'work' done).

I just don't think people who have had plastic surgery should be judged by the same standards as people who chose not to have plastic surgery.

That's like saying a woman who has all gray hair cannot be as beautiful as a woman who dies her hair black/brown or blonde.

In other words, I think they can't be judged the same. It's gotten so that people don't know what beauty is anymore. They see people (men and women) who've had plastic surgery and judge them the same way they judge someone who hasn't had any plastic surgery. It isn't fair to the one who chose not to get it done.

Just one more sign that the world is turning toward the haves and the have nots. If you have the money you can get plastic surgery. If you don't have the money (even if you want plastic surgery) you will have to go without it. Fact of life, way of life.

I don't care for the Kardashians. None of them have any talent...at all. They are famous for being famous.

Annabellethecat--have you seen Kylie lately? She is completely unrecognizable! She has done so much to her face--especially her lips--YIKES! Kendall, on the other hand, seems to be naturally pretty--I don't think she has had any plastic surgery. I AM getting a little tired of having her shoved down our throat by the fashion magazines. She had a multi-page spread in Vogue, for goodness sake. Aren't there more deserving, long working models who should have that kind of exposure? JMHO. BTW, I completely agree with you--the Kardashians can just go--NOW.

I totally agree that I get tired of seeing the SAME people all the time in magazines. There are so many people here in this country. So, let's see someone different!

I feel I've seen enough Jennifer Aniston, Taylor Swift, or whomever else has been photographed endlessly.

I wouldn't mind seeing them pick RANDOM women from anywhere and photograph them. I'd bee much more intrigued by that concept!

Hyacinth

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,737
Registered: ‎03-16-2010
On 2/25/2015 CrystalBlue1 said:

sorry cannot agree on this. Kendall is cute but as for Kylie I find it extremely ridiculous she is acting like her lips tripling in size is her face changing as she gets older. she clearly has had some major surgery. Anyone who can afford to get their face redone by a plastic surgeon could look just as nice and better. before all her plastic surgery she was not cute at all. I have no respect for her or anyone else in that talentless family

as for Kim, she clearly has had major butt implants and it is the most unattractive thing in the world and she also looks nothing like her former self.

Why are these obnoxious people on TV

Do you mean Kim had implants to have her butt look that gigantic ?? Why would any women want that unattractive back side is beyond me?! I just thought she was born with it and that it was natural as all the women except the ones by Bruce have Hugh backsides.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,877
Registered: ‎03-15-2010
Without a doubt Kendall is model gorgeous. There was backlash a while ago from hardworking struggling beautiful models who felt she made it to the top too easily b/c of her name. I get that too.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,347
Registered: ‎07-25-2010

She's taken after Bruce.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,415
Registered: ‎11-25-2011
On 2/25/2015 scatcat said: Without a doubt Kendall is model gorgeous. There was backlash a while ago from hardworking struggling beautiful models who felt she made it to the top too easily b/c of her name. I get that too.

Funny....talk about jealous girls! Are these girls 'back lashing' when movie and/or TV actresses are featured on magazines & commercials instead of those "hardworking struggling" girls? Maybe, just MAYBE, their whining is the reason they don't get booked....Humm.

Like I mentioned above, many celebrities have used their family name/financial success to further their career.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,180
Registered: ‎01-20-2011
She can have all the family names/,foot in the door, etc; but she has to be beautiful and have model body to make it. She clearly has those things. If I had an"in" for something,I would be a fool to not use it. She has had no work done it appears and from all reports is very proper. Good for her...wish it was me...lol.
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,483
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

Kendal has it all for high fashion and did not need the name to make it. Kylie doesn't and that is why she doesn't have the career like Kylie. I am happy for her as she seems to be more sensible than her sisters.

Wrong is still wrong just because you benefited from it.
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,062
Registered: ‎11-20-2012
On 2/25/2015 sidsmom said:

She really has all the Right Stuff. To be a model you have to have great bone structure...and with those le

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Face wise I think she looks a lot like Kim. I thing they all have pretty faces including their mother.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,415
Registered: ‎11-25-2011

Kind1too: This is Kendall. She is 19...turning 20 this Fall.

Super Contributor
Posts: 1,062
Registered: ‎11-20-2012
On 2/25/2015 sidsmom said:

Kind1too: This is Kendall. She is 19...turning 20 this Fall.

Opps! Thanks. Too many KKKKK's.