Beauty

[seehorse]

D

It's not graphically pleasing and is too difficult to use.

[Kjelle]

If give it solid F. Whoever built this obviously did not do it for us. Did they ever look to see what it looks like on a mobile platform? Hello it's 2015 a lot of people use a phone or ipad. I haven't checked on my laptop but it sure is horrible with small, light print on an iPad and hard to read. The sub forums are gone. You can't sort properly,and see the most recent threads as before. No one needs hearts at all. It is nearly non functional. Only my personal ties keep me coming here, but if a significant number of my ladies decided to go elsewhere to talk, I would dump QVC forum altogether. Some suggestions have already been made. Even companies like Coke realize they have an epic failure on their hands and roll it back. Roll it back, QVC!!

[nomless]

Totally agree that inability to display by time of LAST REPLY makes this new app pretty much useless.   I'm sad they did away with decent function of the former app in favor of cutsie but unnecessary features in this one.  Functionality should be the primary goal, IMO.   Obviously, Webbie did not agree.

[Lisrobreib]

F !!! awful 

[Lisrobreib]

F !!! awful  !!

[willdob3]

I don't think it is worth taking the time to grade it. A grade means it has some value. This forum has none.

[lmt]

Horrible. Just horrible.

Difficult to scan the threads and read replies. And I HATE that there are no categories under the different topics. Who wants to scroll through dozens of threads for something you want to look at?

A total fail.

Grade: F

[febe1]

There should be an ease of use to a forum. I'm sorry but this board seems to have arrived after someone tossed all suggestions in a hat and came up with this. I didn't see anything wrong with the last board. Never saw any group suggestions. Instead of suggestions, a good web designer might have done better..

I will visit less and shop less at the Q. It's just a hot mess.

[Cookie777]

ITA !

[Perkup]

A "D" is entirely too generous, unless you're grading on the curve.  Me?  I'd give it an F and make it go back and repeat the course.  Surely they could come up with someething better if they started all over again. Whoever designed and/or approved this needs to be retrained in another field. It's clear they weren't really involved in the now deceased forum.